Skip to content

Conversation

@themidnightgospel
Copy link

@themidnightgospel themidnightgospel commented Nov 18, 2025

This PR adds Imposter to the Testing section.

Imposter is a compile-time mocking library for .NET that:

  • Uses source generators to create strongly-typed mocks at compile time
  • Targets high performance and low allocations during test runs

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated Testing section with a new library entry including reference documentation link.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 18, 2025

Walkthrough

Added Imposter library entry to the Testing section of README.md with its corresponding URL. This is a documentation-only update with no functional code changes or modifications to public APIs.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Updates
README.md
Added Imposter library entry to the Testing section with URL reference

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A rabbit hops through docs so bright,
Adding Imposter to the Testing light,
One simple line, one link so true,
Library friends, now tried and new! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and accurately summarizes the main change: adding the Imposter mocking library to the Testing section of the README.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

756-756: Entry is properly formatted and positioned.

The Imposter library entry is correctly placed in the Testing section with proper alphabetical ordering between GenFu and LightBDD. Formatting matches existing entries. The GitHub URL is valid.

Consider whether the description could mention that Imposter is a compile-time mocking library (using source generators), as this is its key differentiator from other mocking libraries in the list. The current description "The Fastest and Most Memory-Efficient Mocking Library" is generic and could apply to other entries. However, the brevity is consistent with other entries in the Testing section, so this is optional.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d25db57 and c9923fa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant