Skip to content

Conversation

@Nandhini4501
Copy link
Contributor

@Nandhini4501 Nandhini4501 commented Dec 17, 2025

Added a new FAQ as per the ticket https://testsigma.atlassian.net/browse/DOC-413

image

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added FAQ guide explaining how the "Reset session for every test case" setting impacts automation test execution times and provides step-by-step instructions to optimize performance.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 17, 2025

Walkthrough

A new FAQ documentation page added explaining how the "Reset session for every test case" setting extends automation test execution times. Includes front matter configuration and a seven-step resolution guide with visual references to disable per-test-case reset functionality.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
FAQ Documentation
src/pages/docs/FAQs/general/what-causes-longer-automation-test-execution-times-in-a-test-plan.md
New FAQ page added with front matter (title, meta description, order, page_id, warning, contextual links) and step-by-step resolution guide explaining the performance impact of per-test-case session resets

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

  • Verify accuracy of the explanation regarding session reset behavior and execution time impact
  • Validate step-by-step instructions are clear, accurate, and match current UI/product
  • Confirm front matter metadata is correct (page_id, order, contextual links alignment)
  • Check formatting consistency with existing FAQ documentation standards

Suggested reviewers

  • bharathk08

Poem

🐰 A curious doc hops into view,
To show why resets make tests slow—true!
Seven steps to speed up the race,
Sessions now reset in the right place! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'Added a new FAQ' is vague and generic, lacking specificity about which FAQ or what topic is being addressed. Consider a more descriptive title that specifies the FAQ topic, such as 'Add FAQ on test execution times with per-test-case session reset' or similar.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch DOC-413

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 347bb83 and 6de65a1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/pages/docs/FAQs/general/what-causes-longer-automation-test-execution-times-in-a-test-plan.md (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: CI
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/pages/docs/FAQs/general/what-causes-longer-automation-test-execution-times-in-a-test-plan.md (2)

1-43: Clear documentation structure with well-organized resolution steps.

The FAQ is well-written with:

  • Clear problem statement (line 17) explaining the performance impact
  • Properly structured step-by-step resolution guide (lines 21–42)
  • Consistent image references for visual guidance
  • Appropriate metadata and contextual navigation links

The content effectively communicates the issue and resolution to users.


5-5: No issues to address. The page_id with trailing question mark (what-causes-longer-automation-test-execution-times-in-a-test-plan-?) follows the established convention in the documentation codebase for question-formatted FAQ titles. This pattern is used consistently across similar FAQ files and is intentional.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@bharathk08 bharathk08 merged commit 1a5440a into dev Dec 17, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants