Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: additional output for vsi with fips #52

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 12, 2022
Merged

feat: additional output for vsi with fips #52

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 12, 2022

Conversation

argeiger
Copy link
Contributor

@argeiger argeiger commented Aug 12, 2022

Description

This adds an additional output for VSI's with FIPs

Tick the relevant boxes:

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Examples / tests (addition or updates of examples or tests)
  • Documentation update
  • CI related update (pipeline, etc)

Checklist:

  • If relevant, a test for the change has been added / updated as part of this PR.
  • If relevant, documentation for the change has been added / updated as part of this PR.

Merge:

Merge using "Squash and merge" and ensure to use a relevant conventional commit message based on the PR contents (this ultimately determines if a new version of the modules needs to be released, and if so, which semver number should be used).

@argeiger argeiger changed the title Additional output for vsi with fips feat: additional output for vsi with fips Aug 12, 2022
@vburckhardt vburckhardt merged commit 7a31164 into main Aug 12, 2022
@vburckhardt vburckhardt deleted the feature-0812 branch August 12, 2022 20:06
@terraform-ibm-modules-ops
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.1.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants