example checksum: handle nested objects #445
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thank you for your contribution. Could you add a test for this ? Edit: I guess this is already in the test, so it should be good. |
|
Yes, all the tests use this feature 👍 |
pierrot0
approved these changes
Apr 25, 2019
tfds-copybara
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2019
PiperOrigin-RevId: 245727784
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
checksumfunction used during the Dataset Builder tests right now works only on examples that are single level dictionaries; this PR makes it able to work with nested objects of every type.