Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ask contribution to Tensorflow addons for general scope utils, loss, layers, ops #223

Closed
bhack opened this issue Mar 31, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

Comments

@bhack
Copy link
Contributor

bhack commented Mar 31, 2020

As we have just refreshed the model repo as model garden I would enforce the contributions policies of generale use (or already established in literature utils, losses, layers, ops to be contribute more systematically in Tensorflow/addons instead to be embedded or duplicated in the model repos.
E.g:
tensorflow/addons#361 (comment)
tensorflow/addons#1364 (comment)
tensorflow/addons#1366
tensorflow/addons#1226 (comment)
tensorflow/addons#1226 (comment)

/cc @ewilderj @facaiy @seanpmorgan

Policies to be enforced with a PR

https://github.com/tensorflow/models/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
https://github.com/google-research/google-research/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
https://github.com/google/automl/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md

@bhack
Copy link
Contributor Author

bhack commented Mar 31, 2020

/cc @dynamicwebpaige If she is interested.

@bhack
Copy link
Contributor Author

bhack commented Apr 3, 2020

@bhack
Copy link
Contributor Author

bhack commented Jul 12, 2020

I will add in the target contributions repos the new keras-cv and keras-nlp.

@bhack
Copy link
Contributor Author

bhack commented Jul 28, 2020

E.g. See tensorflow/models#8962 (review)

@theadactyl
Copy link
Contributor

@bhack still interested in this?

@bhack
Copy link
Contributor Author

bhack commented Feb 1, 2022

In general this is a still valid topic but:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants