Skip to content

fix: resolve frontmatter lint errors across all specs#229

Open
brendanjryan wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
brendanryan/fix-frontmatter-lint
Open

fix: resolve frontmatter lint errors across all specs#229
brendanjryan wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
brendanryan/fix-frontmatter-lint

Conversation

@brendanjryan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Fixes 18 of 19 frontmatter lint violations caught by #227.

Changes across 12 files:

  • I-D.httpauth-payment target URLdraft-ryan-httpauth-payment (11 specs had stale draft-httpauth-payment or draft-ietf-httpauth-payment URLs)
  • organizationorg in author blocks (card, stripe, tempo charge)
  • Core spec IPRnoModificationTrust200902

Intentionally skipped:

  • Solana spec IPR left as trust200902 per author preference

Depends on #227 for the linter checks.

- Fix I-D.httpauth-payment target URL to draft-ryan-httpauth-payment (11 specs)
- Fix 'organization' -> 'org' in author blocks (card, stripe, tempo)

Leaves IPR values as-is (core and solana use trust200902).
@brendanjryan brendanjryan force-pushed the brendanryan/fix-frontmatter-lint branch from c456f59 to a9c0bd8 Compare April 8, 2026 19:50
@brendanjryan brendanjryan enabled auto-merge (squash) April 8, 2026 19:50
@brendanjryan brendanjryan requested review from jxom and tmm April 8, 2026 19:50
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: c456f59e1d

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread specs/core/draft-httpauth-payment-00.md Outdated
version: 00
category: std
ipr: trust200902
ipr: noModificationTrust200902
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Use a Standards-Track-compatible IPR setting

Switching this draft to noModificationTrust200902 makes the document's legal boilerplate incompatible with its declared Standards Track status (category: std). RFC 7991 explicitly notes that noModificationTrust200902 is incompatible with Standards Track RFCs, so this change can block publication/readiness checks for the core spec and should be reverted to a compatible IPR value (e.g., trust200902).

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Apr 8, 2026

Spec Preview

Spec Changed
draft-card-charge-00 Yes
draft-httpauth-payment-00 Yes
draft-lightning-charge-00 Yes
draft-lightning-session-00 Yes
draft-payment-discovery-00 Yes
draft-payment-intent-charge-00 Yes
draft-payment-transport-mcp-00 Yes
draft-solana-charge-00 Yes
draft-stellar-charge-00 Yes
draft-stripe-charge-00 Yes
draft-tempo-charge-00 Yes
draft-tempo-session-00 Yes

Download spec artifacts (HTML, TXT, XML, PDF)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant