-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 893
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OTEL persistence context deadline #7208
Conversation
6a88f00
to
439bb79
Compare
439bb79
to
2c3ff10
Compare
2c3ff10
to
1d1bdcb
Compare
common/telemetry/grpc.go
Outdated
if ok { | ||
span.SetAttributes(attribute.String("rpc.request.timeout", deadline.Format(time.RFC3339Nano))) | ||
if deadline, ok := ctx.Deadline(); ok { | ||
span.SetAttributes(attribute.Int64("rpc.request.deadline", deadline.UnixNano())) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I realized "deadline" is clearer. And UnixNano
seems like a better choice, too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think both of them make sense. "timeout" should be a duration though. deadline-now
.
common/telemetry/grpc.go
Outdated
if ok { | ||
span.SetAttributes(attribute.String("rpc.request.timeout", deadline.Format(time.RFC3339Nano))) | ||
if deadline, ok := ctx.Deadline(); ok { | ||
span.SetAttributes(attribute.Int64("rpc.request.deadline", deadline.UnixNano())) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think both of them make sense. "timeout" should be a duration though. deadline-now
.
What changed?
Added "persistence.deadline" attributes to OTEL persistence span.
Why?
Add more details for debugging.
How did you test it?
Potential risks
Documentation
Is hotfix candidate?