Introducing Tekton Pipelines Guru on Gurubase.io

[kursataktas]

Hello team,

I'm the maintainer of Anteon. We have created Gurubase.io with the mission of building a centralized, open-source tool-focused knowledge base. Essentially, each "guru" is equipped with custom knowledge to answer user questions based on collected data related to that tool.

I wanted to update you that I've manually added the Tekton Pipelines Guru to Gurubase. Tekton Pipelines Guru uses the data from this repo and data from the docs to answer questions by leveraging the LLM.

In this PR, I showcased the "Tekton Pipelines Guru", which highlights that Tekton Pipelines now has an AI assistant available to help users with their questions. Please let me know your thoughts on this contribution.

Additionally, if you want me to disable Tekton Pipelines Guru in Gurubase, just let me know that's totally fine.

[tekton-robot]

@kursataktas: Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[linux-foundation-easycla]

• ❌ - login: @kursataktas / name: Kursat Aktas . The commit (c7b753d) is not authorized under a signed CLA. Please click here to be authorized. For further assistance with EasyCLA, please submit a support request ticket.

[tekton-robot]

Hi @kursataktas. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a tektoncd member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[tekton-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please assign jeromeju after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @jeromeju in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[kursataktas]

Hi again,

Have you had a chance to check this out?

Additionally, I’d like to update you on the release of the Maintainer Panel feature on Gurubase. With this panel, you can add, remove, or update data sources, as well as change the logo and more. You can find the details here.

In the near future, I’m planning to include analytics insights in this panel, such as the number of questions asked, the most frequently asked ones, and more. I’ll be sure to update this thread once it’s available. However, in case I miss it, I highly recommend joining our Discord channel to stay updated.

If you’d prefer that I don’t update this thread anymore, please let me know.

[afrittoli]

/kind documentation

[afrittoli]

Hello @kursataktas - thank you for this.
Personally I think it's fine to have Tekton featured on GuruBase, docs and source code are open source.

About this PR, I tried a couple of searches and the results look good, but I have no previous experience with Gurubase and I don't know what's the risk of the model hallucinating. @tektoncd/core-maintainers any thoughts?

[waveywaves]

@afrittoli I agree with your concerns
@kursataktas they model is hallucinating, what are the steps being taken to avoid such behavior ?

personally I think this is good for the project and a bit of free marketing for us and good for users who would like to chat with the docs. I tried it out for some other projects and looked good to me, thing we should have this. @kursataktas in the meantime can you sign the CLA and rebase the PR ?

[kursataktas]

Hey everyone,

I just removed this Guru since there didn’t seem to be any interest from your side. I’d be happy to recreate it if you’re still interested.

@waveywaves
To minimize hallucination, we recently introduced an evaluation mechanism. We evaluate the answers and decide whether to generate a response based on the data sources the Guru has access to. For this reason, more data sources mean a more robust Guru.