Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Clarify PoC #140

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2024
Merged

Clarify PoC #140

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion terminology.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -496,12 +496,14 @@ Some real-world examples:

The idea that when differing perspectives come into conflict, our decisions ought to prioritize them in the following (descending) order:

1. End users
1. End users (tool and website users)
robpalme marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
2. JavaScript authors
3. JavaScript engine implementers
4. ECMAScript specification authors
5. Theoretical purity

This ordering is not absolute; a small cost or benefit to a higher-priority group can be overridden by a sufficiently large cost or benefit to a lower-priority group.

While this is not an explicitly adopted goal of TC39, it is a common standards concept which delegates often refer to.

### References
Expand Down
Loading