Skip to content

implementation-defined behavior for Intl.DisplayNames options #521

Closed
@leobalter

Description

@leobalter

The review from #502 got too verbose, I'd like to bring back a pending feedback from @anba:

https://tc39.es/ecma402/#conformance lists options which are allowed to have implementation-defined behaviour. For Intl.DisplayNames, the "style" and "type" options should probably be listed there. I'm not yet sure if it makes sense to allow implementation-defined behaviour for the "fallback" option, because I don't exactly know what other kind of fallback should happen here.

Originally posted by @leobalter in #502 (comment)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions