Small Atomics changes to reduce duplications#835
Conversation
…FromBuffer in Atomics.wake
|
@syg @lars-t-hansen What do you think of these editorial changes? |
|
I think this PR should wait until #1127 is resolved since that will likely rearrange some of the relevant bits. I'm not against it, but I'd probably prefer to re-evaluate changes after that PR lands. (Personally I doubt that changing from a bool to a list of allowed types clarifies anything, but that's mostly a matter of preference and more for TC39 to decide.) |
|
@lars-t-hansen @anba now that #1127 is merged, can this be updated? |
|
@anba, I'll wait until you notify me about any changes. |
|
The change to |
Here are possible changes to avoid some duplications in the Atomics section.
Changes:
Applies on top of #834, but I wanted to keep possible refactorings separate from bug fixes. And I've directly included the changes from #820 in 62ac9b4.