-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 405
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Bug]: v5.10.0 introducing "ReplyError: CROSSSLOT Keys in request don't hash to the same slot" #2660
[Bug]: v5.10.0 introducing "ReplyError: CROSSSLOT Keys in request don't hash to the same slot" #2660
Comments
Can you double-check check you are using the proper prefix? from which version where you upgrading? |
As a sidetone, all our test suite runs against using a custom prefix so that we can run DragonflyDBs tests, so it is unlikely we have introduced a regression in this regard. |
are the tests running on a cluster with multiples nodes ? and yes I've doubled checked, 5.9.0 works 5.10.0 doesn't |
based on the GitHub actions redis's image |
## [5.10.1](v5.10.0...v5.10.1) (2024-07-18) ### Bug Fixes * **repeatable:** consider removing legacy repeatable job ([#2658](#2658)) fixes [#2661](#2661) ([a6764ae](a6764ae)) * **repeatable:** pass custom key as an args in addRepeatableJob to prevent CROSSSLOT issue ([#2662](#2662)) fixes [#2660](#2660) ([9d8f874](9d8f874))
Version
3.10.0
Platform
NodeJS
What happened?
A bug happened after upgrading to v5.10.0 I get a "ReplyError: CROSSSLOT Keys in request don't hash to the same slot"
When using BullMQ against a redis cluster server configured with a '{my_prefix}' prefix !
How to reproduce.
No response
Relevant log output
Code of Conduct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: