-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
Fix authors field parsing in CSV import #4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Corrected the parsing of the 'authors' field in the fromANDREWROBERTSList function to handle empty values, preventing errors when authors are missing in the CSV data.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @adryserage, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses a critical bug in the CSV import functionality, specifically related to the parsing of the 'authors' field. The change ensures that the application can now gracefully handle instances where the 'authors' field in the imported CSV data is empty, thereby preventing parsing failures and enhancing the overall robustness of the data import process.
Highlights
- CSV Parsing Robustness: Modified the
fromANDREWROBERTSList
function insearchApp.html
to prevent errors when parsing the 'authors' field from CSV data if the field is empty or missing. Previously, an empty 'authors' field would cause a parsing error.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request correctly fixes a crash that occurs when parsing the authors
field from a CSV file if the field is empty. The change is robust and consistent with how other fields like tags
are handled.
During the review, I noticed a few other potential issues within the same function that could be improved:
- A bug in the date parsing logic that could lead to incorrect dates.
- Some opportunities to improve code readability and maintainability regarding function naming and data destructuring.
I've added specific comments with suggestions for these points.
searchApp.html
Outdated
}) | ||
.catch(err => console.log(err)); | ||
|
||
function fromANDREWROBERTSList(csv, object) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
JavaScript function names are conventionally written in camelCase
. To adhere to common style guides and improve code consistency, fromANDREWROBERTSList
should be renamed to fromAndrewRobertsList
. Remember to update the call site on line 248 as well.
function fromANDREWROBERTSList(csv, object) { | |
function fromAndrewRobertsList(csv, object) { |
searchApp.html
Outdated
} | ||
const ar = parsedCsv.data; | ||
ar.shift(); | ||
const objAr = ar.reduce((o, [name,description,projectKey,moreinf,,gitHub,created,,,,authors,tags]) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This array destructuring with multiple empty slots for unused CSV columns is hard to read and can be brittle if the CSV structure changes. For improved readability and maintainability, consider accessing the row elements by their index and assigning them to clearly named variables inside the reduce
callback.
For example:
const objAr = ar.reduce((o, row) => {
const name = row[0];
const description = row[1];
// ... and so on for other columns
const authors = row[11];
const tags = row[12];
// ... rest of the logic
return o;
}, []);
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Added update notes for v1.1.2 in README.md and Update.md, detailing fixes for TypeError in `fromANDREWROBERTSList`, null checks for authors field, and improved error handling for Andrew Roberts' spreadsheet data.
@gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request correctly fixes a TypeError
that occurred when parsing CSV data with an empty 'authors' field. It also includes a crucial fix for incorrect date parsing where the month was off by one. The changes effectively improve the application's robustness. I've provided a couple of suggestions to further enhance the data parsing logic for both dates and author names, which will make the code cleaner and more resilient to variations in data formatting.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue #2 Corrected the parsing of the 'authors' field in the fromANDREWROBERTSList function to handle empty values, preventing errors when authors are missing in the CSV data.