Adversarial review of the arm64 result, with the counter-argument published #45
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
priority: highNext, once current work landsNext, once current work landsstatus: needs triageNot yet looked atNot yet looked attype: fairnessA system may have been measured unfairlyA system may have been measured unfairlytype: gateA checkable exit gate for a milestoneA checkable exit gate for a milestone
Milestone
Description
If the arm64 hypothesis holds, it is a result this project wants to be true, which is precisely why it needs someone trying to break it before it is published.
Done when an outside reviewer has attacked the result, and their strongest counter-argument is published alongside it whether or not it changed the conclusion.
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
priority: highNext, once current work landsNext, once current work landsstatus: needs triageNot yet looked atNot yet looked attype: fairnessA system may have been measured unfairlyA system may have been measured unfairlytype: gateA checkable exit gate for a milestoneA checkable exit gate for a milestone
Activity