Update licence hint for JMS serializer #9856
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
JMS serializer changed its license to MIT in v1.12.0
javiereguiluz
added
Status: Reviewed
Serializer
and removed
Status: Needs Review
labels
|
Thanks for taking care of updating this! |
javiereguiluz
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 31, 2018
This PR was merged into the master branch. Discussion ---------- Update licence hint for JMS serializer JMS serializer changed its license to MIT in `v1.12.0` See: - https://github.com/schmittjoh/serializer/releases - schmittjoh/serializer#956 - schmittjoh/serializer#950 I'm not sure which branch this should PR should target. Also, I'm unsure about the best wording, maybe you can guide me a bit? Commits ------- 99d6e35 Update licence hint for JMS serializer
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
JMS serializer changed its license to MIT in
v1.12.0See:
I'm not sure which branch this should PR should target.
Also, I'm unsure about the best wording, maybe you can guide me a bit?