Skip to content

[build-script-impl] Do not actually try to extract symbols when we perform a dry-run. #38919

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor

Otherwise, we can't successfully dry-run a toolchain on darwin.

@gottesmm gottesmm requested a review from edymtt August 18, 2021 02:35
@gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci smoke test

1 similar comment
@gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci smoke test

@shahmishal
Copy link
Member

@swift-ci smoke test macOS

@gottesmm gottesmm force-pushed the pr-26b1714e21e106018d965c705a0c01988543a372 branch from 44b48dd to da37d18 Compare August 31, 2021 21:20
@gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci smoke test

@gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor Author

I added an option to restore the old testing behavior. But by default, we are now going to be able to run dry-run with toolchain.

@gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci smoke test linux platform

…rform a dry-run.

Otherwise, we can't successfully dry-run a toolchain on darwin.

I added an option enable-extract-symbol-dry-run-test that can be set to restore
the previous behavior and updating the BuildSystem unit tests that depend on
that behavior to pass that flag.
@gottesmm gottesmm force-pushed the pr-26b1714e21e106018d965c705a0c01988543a372 branch from da37d18 to 8109819 Compare August 31, 2021 23:57
@gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci smoke test

@gottesmm gottesmm merged commit 6e35487 into swiftlang:main Sep 1, 2021
@gottesmm gottesmm deleted the pr-26b1714e21e106018d965c705a0c01988543a372 branch September 1, 2021 04:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants