Skip to content

[5.1] [test] Tweak unmanaged_objc_throw_func.swift for unoptimized stdlib #24481

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

jrose-apple
Copy link
Contributor

Specifically, a debug stdlib doesn't seem to have an Int specialization of Array.init(arrayLiteral:).

Follow-up to #24331 (cc @theblixguy). This doesn't happen on master because we initialize the Array in place there.

rdar://problem/50417667

Specifically, a debug stdlib doesn't seem to have an Int
specialization of Array.init(arrayLiteral:).

rdar://problem/50417667
@jrose-apple
Copy link
Contributor Author

preset=buildbot_incremental,tools=RA,stdlib=DA,build
@swift-ci Please test with preset macOS

@jrose-apple
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci Please test Linux

@jrose-apple
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hm, wrong syntax?

preset=buildbot_incremental,tools=RA,stdlib=DA,build
@swift-ci Please test macOS with preset

@jrose-apple
Copy link
Contributor Author

preset=buildbot_incremental,tools=RA,stdlib=DA,build
@swift-ci Please test with preset macOS Platform

@jrose-apple
Copy link
Contributor Author

…that's not even the right preset anyway. It won't test.

preset=buildbot,tools=RA,stdlib=DA
@swift-ci Please test with preset macOS

@swift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

swift-ci commented May 3, 2019

Build failed
Swift Test Linux Platform
Git Sha - f0748a3

@shahmishal
Copy link
Member

@swift-ci test Linux

@shahmishal
Copy link
Member

preset=buildbot,tools=RA,stdlib=DA
@swift-ci Please test with preset macOS

@jrose-apple
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci Please test macOS

@jrose-apple jrose-apple merged commit c455ed5 into swiftlang:swift-5.1-branch May 3, 2019
@jrose-apple jrose-apple deleted the 5.1-i-wish-i-was-special branch May 3, 2019 23:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants