Skip to content

[ClangImporter] Retire the term "adapter" in favor of "overlay" #24427

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 3, 2019

Conversation

jrose-apple
Copy link
Contributor

Way back in Swift 1 I was trying to draw a distinction between "overlays", separate libraries that added Swift content to an existing Objective-C framework, and "the Swift part of a mixed-source framework", even though they're implemented in almost exactly the same way. "Adapter module" was the term that covered both of those. In practice, however, no one knew what "adapter" meant. Bring an end to this confusion by just using "overlay" within the compiler even for the mixed-source framework case.

No intended functionality change.

Way back in Swift 1 I was trying to draw a distinction between
"overlays", separate libraries that added Swift content to an existing
Objective-C framework, and "the Swift part of a mixed-source
framework", even though they're implemented in almost exactly the same
way. "Adapter module" was the term that covered both of those. In
practice, however, no one knew what "adapter" meant. Bring an end to
this confusion by just using "overlay" within the compiler even for
the mixed-source framework case.

No intended functionality change.
@jrose-apple jrose-apple requested review from akyrtzi and rjmccall May 2, 2019 03:24
@jrose-apple
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci Please smoke test

Copy link
Member

@compnerd compnerd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jrose-apple jrose-apple merged commit 517f5d6 into swiftlang:master May 3, 2019
@jrose-apple jrose-apple deleted the overthrown branch May 3, 2019 18:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants