-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.5k
[stdlib] Unexport shadow protocols #20509
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
lorentey
merged 10 commits into
swiftlang:master
from
lorentey:not-quite-shadowy-enough
Nov 15, 2018
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0969037
[stdlib] Make _NSDictionaryCore, _NSDictionary internal
lorentey 4f8eeae
[stdlib] Make _NSSetCore, _NSSet internal
lorentey c71abaa
[stdlib] Make protocol _NSNumber internal
lorentey ee17e97
[stdlib] Make protocol _NSArrayCore internal
lorentey 0463230
[stdlib] _SliceBuffer: Make the order of fields a bit more sensible
lorentey c4c4c17
[stdlib] _BridgeStorage: Remove second type parameter (ObjCClass)
lorentey 93a3ebe
[stdlib] Make the rest of the shadow protocols internal
lorentey d707b0b
[stdlib] Re-add dummy versions of _NSSetCore and _NSDictionaryCore on…
lorentey 774ff61
[test] Fix outdated reference to _NSArrayCore
lorentey ca10375
[test] Remove spurious ABI change (?)
lorentey File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nitpick: This was probably written this way because
-objectAtIndexedSubscript:
is just going to call-objectAtIndex:
, and you might as well save that one objc_msgSend.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This does not call
-objectAtIndexedSubscript:
:_nonNative
now returns a_CocoaArrayWrapper
, which is a Swift struct. Its opaque subscript callsobjectAt(_:)
, which is the shadow protocol's pet name for-objectAtIndex:
a.k.a.object(at:)
This does add an extra static function call compared to the original, but those are pretty cheap, and this is on a slow path anyway, so it shouldn't matter much.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Aha, my bad for not taking the whole patch at once. Thanks for the explanation.