Add more file extensions to check-license-header.sh#101
Merged
shahmishal merged 1 commit intoswiftlang:mainfrom Mar 8, 2025
Merged
Add more file extensions to check-license-header.sh#101shahmishal merged 1 commit intoswiftlang:mainfrom
shahmishal merged 1 commit intoswiftlang:mainfrom
Conversation
ahoppen
force-pushed
the
more-license-header-extensions
branch
from
3a5bb50 to
30ecb28
Compare
shahmishal
approved these changes
Mar 8, 2025
Also add a few file extensions that are commonly excluded in `.licenseignore` to avoid duplication. Whether there should indeed not require comments is RFC.
ahoppen
force-pushed
the
more-license-header-extensions
branch
from
30ecb28 to
b92ae42
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Depends on #100
Also add a few file extensions that are commonly excluded in
.licenseignoreto avoid duplication. Whether there should indeed not require comments is RFC.