Skip to content

fix: visionos in podspec #81

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2025
Merged

fix: visionos in podspec #81

merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2025

Conversation

EyreFree
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 24, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.66%. Comparing base (2a36e6c) to head (63e4789).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #81      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.56%   86.66%   +3.10%     
==========================================
  Files          83      108      +25     
  Lines        7397     9260    +1863     
==========================================
+ Hits         6181     8025    +1844     
- Misses       1216     1235      +19     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@swhitty swhitty self-requested a review May 24, 2025 23:07
Copy link
Owner

@swhitty swhitty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah cocoapods support — I will also need to make some changes to the podspec to account for the new DOM module

@swhitty swhitty merged commit 2cf7e1e into swhitty:main May 24, 2025
12 checks passed
@swhitty
Copy link
Owner

swhitty commented May 29, 2025

The latest 0.22.0 release should now work with Cocoapods

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants