Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add vendor extentions to ObjectProperty and MapProperty. [241] #1414

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Sep 8, 2015

Conversation

roykachouh
Copy link

I hope you don't mind, but I came across this issue:

OAI/OpenAPI-Specification#241

I ran into a problem after reading the swagger spec, which seems to suggest the abillity to add a vendor x on a object property.

When using the parser, the vendor-x is blank on a map property.

@fehguy
Copy link
Contributor

fehguy commented Aug 29, 2015

Hi, in concept it sounds good but you now have a failing test. Do you want to look at that?

@fehguy fehguy closed this Aug 29, 2015
@fehguy fehguy reopened this Aug 29, 2015
@fehguy
Copy link
Contributor

fehguy commented Aug 29, 2015

sorry, didn't mean to close

@roykachouh
Copy link
Author

Oh sorry bout that. It was late last night, will take a look later today.

@roykachouh
Copy link
Author

Fixed the tests.

@webron
Copy link
Contributor

webron commented Sep 7, 2015

Can you rebase please?

@webron
Copy link
Contributor

webron commented Sep 7, 2015

Also, the test doesn't seem to cover the MapProperty.

@roykachouh
Copy link
Author

Hi @webron, just rebased.

Also, the test doesn't seem to cover the MapProperty.

I'm not sure I follow. It looks like it's covering the map property - unless, I'm missing something. If anything, it doesn't seem to be covering the ObjectProperty. I added a test for that, will wait on some clarification on the MapProperty

webron added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2015
Add vendor extentions to ObjectProperty and MapProperty. [241]
@webron webron merged commit 19f8122 into swagger-api:master Sep 8, 2015
@fehguy fehguy added this to the v1.5.4 milestone Oct 19, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants