Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix getHasQueryParams to take authMethods into account #8292

Merged

Conversation

AsamK
Copy link

@AsamK AsamK commented Jun 7, 2018

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • Ran the shell script under ./bin/ to update Petstore sample so that CIs can verify the change. (For instance, only need to run ./bin/{LANG}-petstore.sh and ./bin/security/{LANG}-petstore.sh if updating the {LANG} (e.g. php, ruby, python, etc) code generator or {LANG} client's mustache templates). Windows batch files can be found in .\bin\windows\.
  • Filed the PR against the correct branch: 3.0.0 branch for changes related to OpenAPI spec 3.0. Default: master.
  • Copied the technical committee to review the pull request if your PR is targeting a particular programming language.

Description of the PR

getHasQueryParams only checks if queryParams is not empty, but
query params could also be defined by authMethods.

Fixes #7303

I'm not sure about the petstore script, do I have to run all of them and commit the changes?

getHasQueryParams only checks if queryParams is not empty, but
query params could also be defined by authMethods.

Fixes swagger-api#7303
@HugoMario HugoMario merged commit 6862cdd into swagger-api:master Jun 8, 2018
@HugoMario
Copy link
Contributor

thanks a lot @AsamK

@AsamK AsamK deleted the fix_getHasQueryParams_authMethods branch June 8, 2018 15:21
bezineb5 added a commit to bezineb5/swagger-codegen that referenced this pull request May 19, 2020
bezineb5 added a commit to bezineb5/swagger-codegen that referenced this pull request May 19, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants