[python] required fields

[InoMurko]

Python generated client model does not appear to be working for required parameters and reports that None is being passed for required parameters name and catalog_id:

`ERROR: test_backoffice_api_merchant_ad_controller_show (test.test_ad_api.TestAdApi)

Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/priv/backoffice/swagger/test/test_ad_api.py", line 99, in test_backoffice_api_merchant_ad_controller_show
api_response = api_instance.backoffice_api_merchant_ad_controller_show(merchant_id=5, authorization=auth, ad_id=id)
File "/opt/priv/backoffice/swagger/swagger_client/apis/ad_api.py", line 298, in backoffice_api_merchant_ad_controller_show
(data) = self.backoffice_api_merchant_ad_controller_show_with_http_info(merchant_id, ad_id, authorization, **kwargs)
File "/opt/priv/backoffice/swagger/swagger_client/apis/ad_api.py", line 383, in backoffice_api_merchant_ad_controller_show_with_http_info
collection_formats=collection_formats)
File "/opt/priv/backoffice/swagger/swagger_client/api_client.py", line 327, in call_api
_return_http_data_only, collection_formats, _preload_content, _request_timeout)
File "/opt/priv/backoffice/swagger/swagger_client/api_client.py", line 158, in __call_api
return_data = self.deserialize(response_data, response_type)
File "/opt/priv/backoffice/swagger/swagger_client/api_client.py", line 240, in deserialize
return self.__deserialize(data, response_type)
File "/opt/priv/backoffice/swagger/swagger_client/api_client.py", line 280, in __deserialize
return self.__deserialize_model(data, klass)
File "/opt/priv/backoffice/swagger/swagger_client/api_client.py", line 621, in __deserialize_model
instance = klass()
File "/opt/priv/backoffice/swagger/swagger_client/models/ad_show_response.py", line 93, in init
self.name = name
File "/opt/priv/backoffice/swagger/swagger_client/models/ad_show_response.py", line 275, in name
raise ValueError("Invalid value for name, must not be None")
ValueError: Invalid value for name, must not be None
`

Swagger-codegen version

v2.2.3

https://gist.github.com/InoMurko/ce6aa8b938eca3124fc46f3cdddaf8f1

Command line used for generation

python -m unittest discover -s "priv/backoffice/swagger"

The generated model in Python:
`
def init(self, type=None, thumb=None, strength=None, status=None, start_date=None, product_id=None, name=None, id=None, expires=None, description=None, category_id=None, auto_renew=None):
"""
AdShowResponse - a model defined in Swagger
"""

    self._type = None
    self._thumb = None
    self._strength = None
    self._status = None
    self._start_date = None
    self._product_id = None
    self._name = None
    self._id = None
    self._expires = None
    self._description = None
    self._category_id = None
    self._auto_renew = None

    if type is not None:
      self.type = type
    if thumb is not None:
      self.thumb = thumb
    if strength is not None:
      self.strength = strength
    if status is not None:
      self.status = status
    if start_date is not None:
      self.start_date = start_date
    if product_id is not None:
      self.product_id = product_id
    self.name = name
    if id is not None:
      self.id = id
    if expires is not None:
      self.expires = expires
    if description is not None:
      self.description = description
    self.category_id = category_id
    if auto_renew is not None:
      self.auto_renew = auto_renew

`
The generated model in PHP:

/** * Constructor * @param mixed[] $data Associated array of property values initializing the model */ public function __construct(array $data = null) { $this->container['type'] = isset($data['type']) ? $data['type'] : null; $this->container['thumb'] = isset($data['thumb']) ? $data['thumb'] : null; $this->container['strength'] = isset($data['strength']) ? $data['strength'] : null; $this->container['status'] = isset($data['status']) ? $data['status'] : null; $this->container['start_date'] = isset($data['start_date']) ? $data['start_date'] : null; $this->container['product_id'] = isset($data['product_id']) ? $data['product_id'] : null; $this->container['name'] = isset($data['name']) ? $data['name'] : null; $this->container['id'] = isset($data['id']) ? $data['id'] : null; $this->container['expires'] = isset($data['expires']) ? $data['expires'] : null; $this->container['description'] = isset($data['description']) ? $data['description'] : null; $this->container['category_id'] = isset($data['category_id']) ? $data['category_id'] : null; $this->container['auto_renew'] = isset($data['auto_renew']) ? $data['auto_renew'] : null; }

it looks like theres a discrepancy on how required parameters are handled which is causing weird behaviour. I have indeed checked whether the server responds with the correct data (and it does).

{'category_id': 1, 'description': 'none', 'id': 623, 'name': 'my ad for fucks sake', 'product_id': 1, 'type': 'Image watermark'}

[wing328]

File "/opt/priv/backoffice/swagger/test/test_ad_api.py", line 99, in test_backoffice_api_merchant_ad_controller_show
api_response = api_instance.backoffice_api_merchant_ad_controller_show(merchant_id=5, authorization=auth, ad_id=id)

Am I correct in saying that the auto-generated test case (without any modification) result in the error? There were reports that the auto-generated test cases do not work perfectly so we are considering to address the issue by commenting out the test cases

If you actually use the Python API client, does it work? (I think it should)

[InoMurko]

Apis work fine. The generated models don't.

[brucesears]

I am trying to use the python modules auto generated by swagger, and I am running into an issue I think is a bug in ApiClient.deserialize()

`
def deserialize(self, response, response_type):
"""
Deserializes response into an object.

    :param response: RESTResponse object to be deserialized.
    :param response_type: class literal for
        deserialized object, or string of class name.

    :return: deserialized object.
    """
    # handle file downloading
    # save response body into a tmp file and return the instance
    if response_type == "file":
        return self.__deserialize_file(response)

    # fetch data from response object
    try:
        data = json.loads(response.data)
    except ValueError:
        data = response.data

    return self.__deserialize(data, response_type)

`

the problem here seems to be that at least for response_type == list[Host], that the data param ends up looking like this before it is passed into self.__deserialize(...)

{ 'data': [ { <various host attributes and values > }, { < various host attributes and values > }, ... ] }

but it appears that what self.__deserialize(...) is expecting to be passed in its 'data' param should just be this:

[ { <various host attributes and values > }, { < various host attributes and values > }, ... ]

(where Host is one of the model data types.)

my terrifically ugly "fix" may better define the problem:

`class _VsphereClient(ApiClient):
# overrides ApiClient.deserialize()
def deserialize(self, response, response_type):

    # handle file downloading
    # save response body into a tmp file and return the instance
    if response_type == "file":
        return self.__deserialize_file(response)

    # (btw, this looks scary.  why the vaguery about what response.data is supposed to be?)
    try:
        data = json.loads(response.data)
    except ValueError:
        data = response.data

    # here is the fix
    if 'data' in data:
        data = data['data']

    # and this is __extremely__ ugly.  here we are forcing a call to the
    # superclass' private __deserialize() method.  terrible.  terrible.
    return super()._ApiClient__deserialize(data, response_type)

`

i also don't know what evil side-effects lurk in my hacky subclass fix.

[brucesears]

Well my fix then still fails when the model class, say Host, in list[Host], itself has attributes of further depth, say Host attribute has something like 'nics' = list[NIC], then my fix fails to read the deeper content in the json data structure to create the list of NIC objects...

I think to fix, i'll need to subclass ApiClient (as I do above), and then override both deserialize() and __deserialize(). (okay, the latter is not really an override, but just a new private method in the _VsphereClient subclass of ApiClient. point is, super()._ApiClient__deserialize(...) will not be accessed anymore (which is a good thing anyways...)

[brucesears]

i may be incorrect about that last post. i now see embedded lists of specs properly being converted into the list of model objects as they should be. apologies for that not-really-an-issue. the original issue is still there, though.

[wing328]

@brucesears are you using the latest master (2.3.0), which has many enhancements and bug fixes?

[brucesears]

yikes. i see User-Agent: Swagger-Codegen/1.0.0

i assume that is a problem then. but i just built this code-generation facility recently, and I'm not sure how i would have ended up with such an out of date version.

do you have a recommended set of pre-reqs and instructions on how to go about building an up to date swagger python code generation mechanism? where should I look for better instructions on this matter? thanks.

[brucesears]

nevermind. found the page here...

[brucesears]

okay, so the header i find that the swagger client posts: User-Agent: Swagger-Codegen/1.0.0 is either not affiliated with the version of the python code generator (which appears to be the latest stable version 2.2.3), or has another meaning entirely (confusing name that, then.) would be nice if the swagger-codegen version appeared at the top of all such generated code...

at any rate, i've fallen back to using the _preload_content = False parameter for reads in general, and poking a hole through to directly access ApiClient.__deserialize(...), as yucky as that is. my problems seem to stem around what ApiClient.deserialize(...) does with single model object specs vs lists of such.

to be honest, i don't know if i am running into problems in ApiClient around deserialization or if there are oddities in the API definition. i'd say i'm 80% sure it is the former, but some or all could be issues in the latter.

[wing328]

okay, so the header i find that the swagger client posts: User-Agent: Swagger-Codegen/1.0.0 is either not affiliated with the version of the python code generator (which appears to be the latest stable version 2.2.3), or has another meaning entirely (confusing name that, then.) would be nice if the swagger-codegen version appeared at the top of all such generated code...

1.0.0 refers to the version of the Python API client, not Swagger Codegen.

You can find the Swagger Codegen version in the auto-generated .swagger-codegen/VERSION

[brucesears]

.swagger-codegen/VERSION contains:

2.3.0-SNAPSHOT