Open
Description
Description
Here is the suggestion by @frol
Semantically, projectName should be the "most important" configuration, which would be used to generate packageName (meaning that it is the other way around than it is implemented now), BUT given the fact that packageName was introduced earlier, it makes sense to have this backward packageName to projectName generation. Can both projectName -> packageName and packageName -> projectName autogenerations be implemented? Does this make sense to you?
Swagger-codegen version
Latest master
Related issues
https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-codegen/pull/5836``
Suggest a Fix
If anyone has feedback or wants to work on this enhancement, please reply to let us know.