fix: don't show state_referenced_locally warning on types

[paoloricciuti]

Svelte 5 rewrite

Closes #13173

I had to add a ts-ignore because the types for the types declaration are not in the path types and i don't think they are worth adding.

Please note that the Svelte codebase is currently being rewritten for Svelte 5. Changes should target Svelte 5, which lives on the default branch (main).

If your PR concerns Svelte 4 (including updates to svelte.dev.docs), please ensure the base branch is svelte-4 and not main.

Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following

• It's really useful if your PR references an issue where it is discussed ahead of time. In many cases, features are absent for a reason. For large changes, please create an RFC: https://github.com/sveltejs/rfcs
• Prefix your PR title with feat:, fix:, chore:, or docs:.
• This message body should clearly illustrate what problems it solves.
• Ideally, include a test that fails without this PR but passes with it.

Tests and linting

• Run the tests with pnpm test and lint the project with pnpm lint

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 59f53d0

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package

Name	Type
svelte	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[dummdidumm]

Inside compiler/index.js#compile we're stripping away type annotations before passing it on to the analysis phase etc - I think the better fix would be to strip those types there, i.e. investigate why they aren't removed within remove_typescript_nodes

[paoloricciuti]

Inside compiler/index.js#compile we're stripping away type annotations before passing it on to the analysis phase etc - I think the better fix would be to strip those types there, i.e. investigate why they aren't removed within remove_typescript_nodes

Uh i missed this...gonna take a look 😉

[paoloricciuti]

Inside compiler/index.js#compile we're stripping away type annotations before passing it on to the analysis phase etc - I think the better fix would be to strip those types there, i.e. investigate why they aren't removed within remove_typescript_nodes

We were simply missing a visitor for type annotations. Much better fix, thanks

[dummdidumm]

If we want to adjust this in the future, an alternative would be to adjust zimmerframe so that if you return null (for example) that this signals to zimmerframe "remove this node"

[paoloricciuti]

If we want to adjust this in the future, an alternative would be to adjust zimmerframe so that if you return null (for example) that this signals to zimmerframe "remove this node"

That would be actually better and useful