-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
Run check on all addons test #569
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
brettearle
wants to merge
3
commits into
sveltejs:main
Choose a base branch
from
brettearle:runCheckOnAllAddonsTest
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you please elaborate why we are not using this anymore? What was the problem with this call? Is it potentially fixable inside
addHooksHandle
or do we potentially have to check all other callees of this function for similar issues?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Flow issue
-> paraglide adds doc comment to solve checking issues with handler types
-> adds to file correctly
-> Lucia parses script (*main issue here = this removes added doc comments as acorn doesn't support them, from my digging **note I've never used acorn)
-> Lucia adds it's doc comment but resulting file misses paraglide.
I went with the string route as the solution here as it also ties into Ben wanting to add more string returns in issue #557.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm probably missing something, but I don't see any code adding a comment inside
addHooksHandle
that could cause this. Also tried running the adapter with JsDocUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think it's adding of the comment that fails. I think it is what it holds in memory as the ast (once again it's my first day with acorn and asts). I think it holds everything except the comments. Everytime I tried it with both using ast implementation it would drop 1 of the doc comments
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will re look into it, I didn't document the why. From memory acorn doesn't read comments back in when it reads the same file back in. So first comment gets dropped when new hook is added, which is why second order has to be strong. But will need to reconfirm my human memory
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No problem. Acorn/sv is doing some weirdness around comments, but i did not experience anything like this. Maybe it's just
esrap
thats not printing them correctly or something.Also please let me know, once you get back to it, about which comment you are talking exactly, as I didn't manage to figure that out.