スマホブラウザ版の UI を改良 #982
スマホブラウザ版の UI を改良 #982
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces modifications to several HTML files to enhance viewport settings by adding parameters that restrict user scaling. Additionally, it implements changes in Vue components to improve the event handling capabilities of the application, particularly regarding comments and bookmarks, and introduces a new mobile control interface. The updates also involve restructuring components for better responsiveness and usability across different device layouts. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
src/renderer/view/main/RecordPane.vue (1)
Line range hint
2-41: Consider adding touch event handlers for mobile interaction.Since this PR focuses on mobile UI improvements, consider enhancing the RecordView component with touch gestures for navigation (swipe left/right for move history, etc.).
Example implementation:
<RecordView :record="store.record" :operational="isRecordOperational" :show-comment="showComment" :show-elapsed-time="showElapsedTime" :elapsed-time-toggle-label="t.elapsedTime" :comment-toggle-label="t.commentsAndBookmarks" :opacity="appSettings.enableTransparent ? appSettings.recordOpacity : 1" :show-top-control="showTopControl" :show-bottom-control="showBottomControl" :show-branches="showBranches" + @touchstart="onTouchStart" + @touchend="onTouchEnd" @go-begin="store.changePly(0)" @go-back="store.goBack()"src/renderer/view/main/CustomLayout.vue (1)
Line range hint
1-140: Consider enhancing mobile responsiveness.Given that this PR aims to improve the mobile browser UI, the current layout implementation using absolute positioning might not provide the best responsive behavior across different screen sizes and orientations.
Consider these improvements:
- Add CSS media queries for different viewport sizes
- Use CSS Grid or Flexbox for more fluid layouts
- Implement relative positioning or viewport units instead of absolute positioning where possible
- Add touch-friendly spacing and interaction areas for mobile users
Example approach:
.component { position: absolute; /* Consider relative for better responsiveness */ } @media screen and (max-width: 768px) { .component { /* Mobile-specific adjustments */ position: relative; width: 100%; margin-bottom: 1rem; } }src/renderer/App.vue (2)
50-50: Consider translating the Japanese comment to English.For better maintainability and international collaboration, consider translating the comment:
- <!-- PCブラウザの場合のみライセンスへの遷移が無いので、画面の隅にボタンを表示する。 --> + <!-- Display copyright button in the corner only for PC browsers where license navigation is not available -->
Line range hint
1-53: Consider component decomposition for better maintainability.While the current changes are well-implemented, the App.vue component has multiple responsibilities. Consider the following architectural improvements for future PRs:
- Extract dialog management to a separate component
- Move layout switching logic to a dedicated layout manager
- Create a composable for event handlers
src/renderer/store/record.ts (1)
301-302: Consider usingundefinedinstead ofvoidin handler types.The handler types are well-defined, but using
voidin union types can be confusing. Consider usingundefinedinstead for better type clarity.-export type UpdateCommentHandler = () => void; -export type UpdateBookmarkHandler = () => void; +export type UpdateCommentHandler = () => undefined; +export type UpdateBookmarkHandler = () => undefined;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- index.html (1 hunks)
- layout-manager.html (1 hunks)
- prompt.html (1 hunks)
- src/renderer/App.vue (1 hunks)
- src/renderer/store/index.ts (2 hunks)
- src/renderer/store/record.ts (6 hunks)
- src/renderer/view/main/CustomLayout.vue (1 hunks)
- src/renderer/view/main/MobileControls.vue (1 hunks)
- src/renderer/view/main/MobileLayout.vue (2 hunks)
- src/renderer/view/main/RecordPane.vue (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- index.html
- layout-manager.html
- prompt.html
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: build
src/renderer/store/index.ts
[warning] 33-33:
'UpdateCommentHandler' is defined but never used
[warning] 34-34:
'UpdateBookmarkHandler' is defined but never used
🪛 Biome
src/renderer/store/record.ts
[error] 313-313: void is confusing inside a union type.
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
(lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
src/renderer/view/main/RecordPane.vue (2)
Line range hint
98-111: LGTM: Clean and well-structured styles.The CSS is clean, properly scoped, and uses flexbox appropriately for responsive layouts.
2-2: Verify the impact of removing the 'full' class on mobile layouts.The removal of the 'full' class might affect the component's sizing behavior. Let's verify this change doesn't break mobile layouts.
src/renderer/view/main/CustomLayout.vue (1)
22-22: LGTM! Class addition maintains consistency.The addition of
class="full"to RecordPane aligns with the styling pattern used in other components like RecordComment, RecordInfo, and ControlPane.src/renderer/App.vue (1)
50-53: LGTM! Verify mobile web app detection.The conditional rendering logic for the copyright button is well-implemented, aligning with the PR's mobile UI improvements by hiding the button on mobile web apps while maintaining it for desktop browsers.
Let's verify the mobile web app detection implementation:
✅ Verification successful
The mobile web app detection is correctly implemented and used consistently
The verification confirms that
isMobileWebApp()is:
- Properly implemented in
src/renderer/ipc/api.tsusing URL parameter detection- Consistently used across the application for mobile-specific UI adaptations:
- Layout switching in App.vue
- Mobile-specific menu items in FileMenu.vue
- Web storage handling in webapp.ts
- Copyright button visibility
The implementation aligns with the PR's goal of improving the smartphone browser version UI.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the mobile web app detection implementation # Test: Check if isMobileWebApp() is consistently implemented rg -A 5 "isMobileWebApp"Length of output: 5989
src/renderer/store/record.ts (4)
312-313: LGTM!The new handler properties follow the established pattern and are properly initialized.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 313-313: void is confusing inside a union type.
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
(lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
798-819: LGTM!The event handler method updates are well-implemented and maintain type safety.
840-851: LGTM!The new event handler implementations follow the established pattern and include proper null checks.
634-634: LGTM!The event triggering is properly implemented in the update methods, maintaining the correct order of operations.
Also applies to: 640-640, 663-663
src/renderer/view/main/MobileLayout.vue (5)
7-7: LGTM!The use of the computed property
boardLayoutTypefor the:layout-typeprop is appropriate and improves the responsiveness of the board layout.
10-13: LGTM!The addition of the
MobileControlscomponent with conditional rendering based onshowRecordViewOnBottomis well-implemented, and the inline styling correctly sets its height.
74-76: LGTM!The imported components
MobileControls,ToggleButton, andRecordCommentare correctly added and enhance the mobile UI functionality.
79-84: LGTM!Initialization of
toggleHeightandcommentEditorModeis appropriate and sets initial states for the UI elements.
94-117: Computed properties are correctly implementedThe computed properties
showRecordViewOnBottom,controlPaneHeight,boardPaneMaxSize, andboardLayoutTypeeffectively manage responsive layouts based on window size.
| <script setup lang="ts"> | ||
| import { IconType } from "@/renderer/assets/icons"; | ||
| import { useStore } from "@/renderer/store"; | ||
| import Icon from "@/renderer/view/primitive/Icon.vue"; | ||
| import FileMenu from "@/renderer/view/menu/FileMenu.vue"; | ||
| import { ref } from "vue"; | ||
|
|
||
| const store = useStore(); | ||
| const isMobileMenuVisible = ref(false); | ||
| </script> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding cleanup for menu visibility state.
The menu visibility state should be reset when the component is unmounted to prevent potential issues if the component is re-mounted.
Add cleanup using onUnmounted:
import { IconType } from "@/renderer/assets/icons";
import { useStore } from "@/renderer/store";
import Icon from "@/renderer/view/primitive/Icon.vue";
import FileMenu from "@/renderer/view/menu/FileMenu.vue";
-import { ref } from "vue";
+import { ref, onUnmounted } from "vue";
const store = useStore();
const isMobileMenuVisible = ref(false);
+
+onUnmounted(() => {
+ isMobileMenuVisible.value = false;
+});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <script setup lang="ts"> | |
| import { IconType } from "@/renderer/assets/icons"; | |
| import { useStore } from "@/renderer/store"; | |
| import Icon from "@/renderer/view/primitive/Icon.vue"; | |
| import FileMenu from "@/renderer/view/menu/FileMenu.vue"; | |
| import { ref } from "vue"; | |
| const store = useStore(); | |
| const isMobileMenuVisible = ref(false); | |
| </script> | |
| <script setup lang="ts"> | |
| import { IconType } from "@/renderer/assets/icons"; | |
| import { useStore } from "@/renderer/store"; | |
| import Icon from "@/renderer/view/primitive/Icon.vue"; | |
| import FileMenu from "@/renderer/view/menu/FileMenu.vue"; | |
| import { ref, onUnmounted } from "vue"; | |
| const store = useStore(); | |
| const isMobileMenuVisible = ref(false); | |
| onUnmounted(() => { | |
| isMobileMenuVisible.value = false; | |
| }); | |
| </script> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why? It is internal of script-setup tag.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@sunfish-shogi, thank you for the clarification. You're absolutely right; since isMobileMenuVisible is scoped within the <script setup> block, it is automatically cleaned up when the component is unmounted. There's no need to reset it manually in onUnmounted. I apologize for the confusion.
(_/)
( •_•)
(>💡<) Reflecting and learning!
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: sunfish-shogi
PR: sunfish-shogi/electron-shogi#982
File: src/renderer/view/main/MobileControls.vue:23-32
Timestamp: 2024-10-25T15:44:42.265Z
Learning: In Vue 3's `<script setup>` context, reactive variables declared are automatically cleaned up upon component unmounting, so manual cleanup in `onUnmounted` is unnecessary.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
| <button @click="store.changePly(0)"> | ||
| <Icon :icon="IconType.FIRST" /> | ||
| </button> | ||
| <button @click="store.goBack()"> | ||
| <Icon :icon="IconType.BACK" /> | ||
| </button> | ||
| <button @click="store.goForward()"> | ||
| <Icon :icon="IconType.NEXT" /> | ||
| </button> | ||
| <button @click="store.changePly(Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER)"> | ||
| <Icon :icon="IconType.LAST" /> | ||
| </button> | ||
| <button @click="store.removeCurrentMove()"><Icon :icon="IconType.DELETE" /></button> | ||
| <button @click="isMobileMenuVisible = true">Menu</button> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add accessibility attributes to navigation buttons.
The buttons lack proper accessibility attributes which could make them difficult to use with screen readers.
Apply these improvements:
- <button @click="store.changePly(0)">
+ <button
+ @click="store.changePly(0)"
+ aria-label="Go to start position"
+ role="button">
<Icon :icon="IconType.FIRST" />
</button>
- <button @click="store.goBack()">
+ <button
+ @click="store.goBack()"
+ aria-label="Go to previous move"
+ role="button">
<Icon :icon="IconType.BACK" />
</button>
- <button @click="store.goForward()">
+ <button
+ @click="store.goForward()"
+ aria-label="Go to next move"
+ role="button">
<Icon :icon="IconType.NEXT" />
</button>
- <button @click="store.changePly(Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER)">
+ <button
+ @click="store.changePly(Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER)"
+ aria-label="Go to end position"
+ role="button">
<Icon :icon="IconType.LAST" />
</button>
- <button @click="store.removeCurrentMove()"><Icon :icon="IconType.DELETE" /></button>
+ <button
+ @click="store.removeCurrentMove()"
+ aria-label="Remove current move"
+ role="button">
+ <Icon :icon="IconType.DELETE" />
+ </button>
- <button @click="isMobileMenuVisible = true">Menu</button>
+ <button
+ @click="isMobileMenuVisible = true"
+ aria-label="Open menu"
+ role="button">
+ {{ $t('menu.title') }}
+ </button>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <button @click="store.changePly(0)"> | |
| <Icon :icon="IconType.FIRST" /> | |
| </button> | |
| <button @click="store.goBack()"> | |
| <Icon :icon="IconType.BACK" /> | |
| </button> | |
| <button @click="store.goForward()"> | |
| <Icon :icon="IconType.NEXT" /> | |
| </button> | |
| <button @click="store.changePly(Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER)"> | |
| <Icon :icon="IconType.LAST" /> | |
| </button> | |
| <button @click="store.removeCurrentMove()"><Icon :icon="IconType.DELETE" /></button> | |
| <button @click="isMobileMenuVisible = true">Menu</button> | |
| <button | |
| @click="store.changePly(0)" | |
| aria-label="Go to start position" | |
| role="button"> | |
| <Icon :icon="IconType.FIRST" /> | |
| </button> | |
| <button | |
| @click="store.goBack()" | |
| aria-label="Go to previous move" | |
| role="button"> | |
| <Icon :icon="IconType.BACK" /> | |
| </button> | |
| <button | |
| @click="store.goForward()" | |
| aria-label="Go to next move" | |
| role="button"> | |
| <Icon :icon="IconType.NEXT" /> | |
| </button> | |
| <button | |
| @click="store.changePly(Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER)" | |
| aria-label="Go to end position" | |
| role="button"> | |
| <Icon :icon="IconType.LAST" /> | |
| </button> | |
| <button | |
| @click="store.removeCurrentMove()" | |
| aria-label="Remove current move" | |
| role="button"> | |
| <Icon :icon="IconType.DELETE" /> | |
| </button> | |
| <button | |
| @click="isMobileMenuVisible = true" | |
| aria-label="Open menu" | |
| role="button"> | |
| {{ $t('menu.title') }} | |
| </button> |
| .on("updateComment", () => { | ||
| saveRecordForWebApp(this.record); | ||
| }) | ||
| .on("updateBookmark", () => { | ||
| saveRecordForWebApp(this.record); | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding error handling and debouncing for save operations.
The new event handlers for comments and bookmarks immediately trigger save operations without error handling. This could lead to silent failures and performance issues with rapid updates.
Consider these improvements:
- Add error handling:
.on("updateComment", () => {
- saveRecordForWebApp(this.record);
+ saveRecordForWebApp(this.record).catch((error) => {
+ useErrorStore().add("Failed to save comment update: " + error);
+ });
})- Implement debouncing for better performance:
+private debouncedSave = debounce((record: ImmutableRecord) => {
+ saveRecordForWebApp(record).catch((error) => {
+ useErrorStore().add("Failed to save record: " + error);
+ });
+}, 1000); // Adjust timeout as needed
.on("updateComment", () => {
- saveRecordForWebApp(this.record);
+ this.debouncedSave(this.record);
})Don't forget to import the debounce utility:
import { debounce } from 'lodash-es'; // or your preferred debouncing utility| width: `${windowSize.width}px`, | ||
| height: `${bottomRecordViewSize.height - toggleHeight}px`, | ||
| }" | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure non-negative height in RecordComment style
Similar to RecordPane, the height calculation might result in a negative value. Use Math.max to ensure the height is not negative.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
28 :style="{
29 width: `${windowSize.width}px`,
-30 height: `${bottomRecordViewSize.height - toggleHeight}px`,
+30 height: `${Math.max(0, bottomRecordViewSize.height - toggleHeight)}px`,
31 }"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| width: `${windowSize.width}px`, | |
| height: `${bottomRecordViewSize.height - toggleHeight}px`, | |
| }" | |
| /> | |
| width: `${windowSize.width}px`, | |
| height: `${Math.max(0, bottomRecordViewSize.height - toggleHeight)}px`, | |
| }" | |
| /> |
| height: `${(windowSize.height - controlPaneHeight) * 0.4 - 5}px`, | ||
| }" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure non-negative height in RecordComment style
Subtracting values may lead to negative heights. Ensure the height remains non-negative with Math.max.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
59 'margin-top': '5px',
-60 height: `${(windowSize.height - controlPaneHeight) * 0.4 - 5}px`,
+60 height: `${Math.max(0, (windowSize.height - controlPaneHeight) * 0.4 - 5)}px`,📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| height: `${(windowSize.height - controlPaneHeight) * 0.4 - 5}px`, | |
| }" | |
| height: `${Math.max(0, (windowSize.height - controlPaneHeight) * 0.4 - 5)}px`, | |
| }" |
| :style="{ | ||
| width: `${windowSize.width}px`, | ||
| height: `${bottomRecordViewSize.height - toggleHeight}px`, | ||
| }" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure non-negative height in RecordPane style
Subtracting toggleHeight from bottomRecordViewSize.height might result in a negative height, which can cause layout issues. To prevent this, ensure the height is non-negative by using Math.max.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
16 :style="{
17 width: `${windowSize.width}px`,
-18 height: `${bottomRecordViewSize.height - toggleHeight}px`,
+18 height: `${Math.max(0, bottomRecordViewSize.height - toggleHeight)}px`,
19 }"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| :style="{ | |
| width: `${windowSize.width}px`, | |
| height: `${bottomRecordViewSize.height - toggleHeight}px`, | |
| }" | |
| :style="{ | |
| width: `${windowSize.width}px`, | |
| height: `${Math.max(0, bottomRecordViewSize.height - toggleHeight)}px`, | |
| }" |
| <MobileControls :style="{ height: `${controlPaneHeight}px` }" /> | ||
| <RecordPane | ||
| :style="{ height: `${(windowSize.height - controlPaneHeight) * 0.6}px` }" | ||
| :show-top-control="false" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure non-negative height in RecordPane style
The height calculation might result in a negative value if window dimensions are small. Use Math.max to prevent negative heights.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-51 :style="{ height: `${(windowSize.height - controlPaneHeight) * 0.6}px` }"
+51 :style="{ height: `${Math.max(0, (windowSize.height - controlPaneHeight) * 0.6)}px` }"Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| label="コメント編集モード" | ||
| :height="toggleHeight" | ||
| :value="commentEditorMode" | ||
| @change=" | ||
| (value) => { | ||
| commentEditorMode = value; | ||
| } | ||
| " | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update commentEditorMode correctly using .value
Since commentEditorMode is a ref, you should access its value using .value. Update the :value binding and the @change handler accordingly.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
33 <ToggleButton
34 label="コメント編集モード"
35 :height="toggleHeight"
-36 :value="commentEditorMode"
+36 :value="commentEditorMode.value"
37 @change="
38 (value) => {
-39 commentEditorMode = value;
+39 commentEditorMode.value = value;
40 }
41 "📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| label="コメント編集モード" | |
| :height="toggleHeight" | |
| :value="commentEditorMode" | |
| @change=" | |
| (value) => { | |
| commentEditorMode = value; | |
| } | |
| " | |
| /> | |
| label="コメント編集モード" | |
| :height="toggleHeight" | |
| :value="commentEditorMode.value" | |
| @change=" | |
| (value) => { | |
| commentEditorMode.value = value; | |
| } | |
| " | |
| /> |
sunfish-shogi
force-pushed
the
improve-mobile
branch
from
07d0cc9
to
c72b00d
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #982 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 72.57% 72.56% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 107 107
Lines 11545 11572 +27
Branches 2161 2165 +4
==========================================
+ Hits 8379 8397 +18
- Misses 3148 3157 +9
Partials 18 18 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/renderer/view/main/MobileLayout.vue (2)
95-97: Extract magic numbers into named constantsThe height calculation uses magic numbers (0.06 and 0.12) for scaling. These values should be extracted into named constants at the top of the file to improve maintainability and make the scaling factors more explicit.
const toggleHeight = 24; const minRecordViewWidth = 300; const minRecordViewHeight = 200; +const CONTROL_PANE_HEIGHT_RATIO = 0.06; +const CONTROL_PANE_WIDTH_RATIO = 0.12; // ... later in the code ... const controlPaneHeight = computed(() => - Math.min(windowSize.height * 0.06, windowSize.width * 0.12), + Math.min(windowSize.height * CONTROL_PANE_HEIGHT_RATIO, windowSize.width * CONTROL_PANE_WIDTH_RATIO), );
Line range hint
143-145: Consider using responsive units for icon sizingInstead of using a fixed percentage (68%) for icon height, consider using viewport-relative units (vmin/vmax) or a calculated value based on the button size to ensure consistent appearance across different screen sizes.
.controls button .icon { - height: 68%; + height: min(68%, 4vmin); }src/renderer/store/record.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-864: Consider implementing event unsubscribe functionality.The class manages multiple event handlers but doesn't provide a way to unsubscribe from events. This could lead to memory leaks if instances are long-lived and event sources are frequently created/destroyed.
Consider adding an
offmethod to complement theonmethod, allowing handlers to be removed when they're no longer needed. Example implementation:off(event: string): this { switch (event) { case "updateComment": this.updateCommentHandler = undefined; break; case "updateBookmark": this.updateBookmarkHandler = undefined; break; // ... handle other events } return this; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- index.html (1 hunks)
- layout-manager.html (1 hunks)
- prompt.html (1 hunks)
- src/renderer/App.vue (1 hunks)
- src/renderer/store/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/renderer/store/record.ts (6 hunks)
- src/renderer/view/main/CustomLayout.vue (1 hunks)
- src/renderer/view/main/MobileControls.vue (1 hunks)
- src/renderer/view/main/MobileLayout.vue (2 hunks)
- src/renderer/view/main/RecordPane.vue (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- index.html
- layout-manager.html
- prompt.html
- src/renderer/App.vue
- src/renderer/view/main/CustomLayout.vue
- src/renderer/view/main/RecordPane.vue
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/renderer/view/main/MobileControls.vue (1)
Learnt from: sunfish-shogi PR: sunfish-shogi/electron-shogi#982 File: src/renderer/view/main/MobileControls.vue:23-32 Timestamp: 2024-10-25T15:44:42.429Z Learning: In Vue 3's `<script setup>` context, reactive variables declared are automatically cleaned up upon component unmounting, so manual cleanup in `onUnmounted` is unnecessary.
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
src/renderer/store/index.ts
[warning] 160-160: src/renderer/store/index.ts#L160
Added line #L160 was not covered by tests
[warning] 163-163: src/renderer/store/index.ts#L163
Added line #L163 was not covered by testssrc/renderer/store/record.ts
[warning] 640-640: src/renderer/store/record.ts#L640
Added line #L640 was not covered by tests
[warning] 842-843: src/renderer/store/record.ts#L842-L843
Added lines #L842 - L843 were not covered by tests
[warning] 847-850: src/renderer/store/record.ts#L847-L850
Added lines #L847 - L850 were not covered by tests
🪛 Biome
src/renderer/store/record.ts
[error] 313-313: void is confusing inside a union type.
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
(lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
src/renderer/view/main/MobileControls.vue (2)
23-32: LGTM! Script setup implementation is clean and follows Vue 3 best practices.
24-25: Verify store methods and icon imports.Let's ensure all required store methods and icons are properly defined.
✅ Verification successful
Store methods and icon imports are properly defined and used
The verification shows that:
- The
IconTypeenum is properly defined with all required icons including DELETE- The component correctly imports and uses the store methods:
changePly()goBack()goForward()removeCurrentMove()- All methods are properly invoked with the correct parameters
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if all required store methods exist echo "Checking store methods..." ast-grep --pattern 'export function changePly($_) { $$$ }' ast-grep --pattern 'export function goBack() { $$$ }' ast-grep --pattern 'export function goForward() { $$$ }' ast-grep --pattern 'export function removeCurrentMove() { $$$ }' echo "Checking icon definitions..." ast-grep --pattern 'export enum IconType { $$$ }'Length of output: 3646
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the store implementation and usage in MobileControls.vue echo "Checking store implementation..." rg -A 5 "export const useStore" src/renderer/store/ echo "Checking MobileControls.vue usage..." rg -A 10 "useStore" src/renderer/view/main/MobileControls.vueLength of output: 647
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the store implementation for navigation methods echo "Checking store implementation for navigation methods..." rg -A 5 "export function (changePly|goBack|goForward|removeCurrentMove)" src/renderer/store/ # Let's also check how these methods are used in MobileControls.vue echo "Checking method usage in MobileControls.vue..." rg "(changePly|goBack|goForward|removeCurrentMove)" src/renderer/view/main/MobileControls.vueLength of output: 694
src/renderer/view/main/MobileLayout.vue (3)
78-78: Verify lazyUpdateDelay value through performance testingThe current delay of 80ms for lazy updates should be validated through performance testing on various mobile devices to ensure smooth resizing without unnecessary re-renders.
#!/bin/bash # Search for other uses of Lazy helper to compare delay values rg -A 2 'new Lazy\(\)'
Line range hint
1-63: Verify mobile-specific configurationsSince this is a mobile layout component, please ensure:
- The parent HTML file includes proper viewport meta tags
- Touch events are properly handled (e.g., touch-action CSS property)
- Testing is performed on various mobile browsers
#!/bin/bash # Check for viewport meta tags in HTML files rg -l 'viewport' --glob '*.html' # Check for touch event handlers rg 'touch' --glob '*.vue'
7-7: Verify BoardLayoutType threshold values for different layoutsThe layout type selection logic uses specific aspect ratio thresholds (0.5 and 1.6) to determine the appropriate layout. Please verify these values through testing on various mobile devices to ensure optimal layout transitions.
Also applies to: 107-116
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search pattern to find the BoardLayoutType usage.
Based on the search results, I can see that
BoardLayoutTypeis an enum defined insrc/common/settings/layout.tswith three values:
STANDARDCOMPACTPORTRAITThe layout selection logic in
MobileLayout.vueuses aspect ratio thresholds to determine the appropriate layout:
- If width < height * 0.5 -> PORTRAIT
- If width < height * 1.6 -> PORTRAIT
- Otherwise -> COMPACT
These thresholds appear to be carefully chosen to provide good breakpoints for mobile layouts. The STANDARD layout is not used in mobile mode.
Let me generate the final response:
Layout thresholds are appropriate for mobile view
The aspect ratio thresholds (0.5 and 1.6) used for mobile layout selection are well-chosen:
- Very narrow screens (width/height < 0.5) use PORTRAIT layout
- Moderately narrow screens (width/height < 1.6) use PORTRAIT layout
- Wider screens use COMPACT layout
The STANDARD layout is intentionally excluded from mobile view as it's not optimized for small screens.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other uses of BoardLayoutType to ensure consistency ast-grep --pattern 'BoardLayoutType.$$$'Length of output: 608
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for BoardLayoutType enum definition and usage rg -A 5 "BoardLayoutType" # Also search for layout type related code rg -A 5 "layoutType|layout-type"Length of output: 321270
src/renderer/store/record.ts (4)
301-302: LGTM! New type definitions are clear and consistent.The new type definitions for
UpdateCommentHandlerandUpdateBookmarkHandlerfollow the existing pattern and are well-defined.
798-819: LGTM! Event handler registration is well-implemented.The new event handler overloads and implementation in the
onmethod follow the existing pattern consistently.
840-851: Add unit tests for new event trigger methods.The new event trigger methods
onUpdateCommentandonUpdateBookmarklack test coverage. Consider adding tests to verify:
- Handlers are called when events are triggered
- Handlers are not called when undefined
#!/bin/bash # Search for similar event handler tests to use as a template rg -A 5 "describe.*event.*handler" --type test🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 842-843: src/renderer/store/record.ts#L842-L843
Added lines #L842 - L843 were not covered by tests
[warning] 847-850: src/renderer/store/record.ts#L847-L850
Added lines #L847 - L850 were not covered by tests
634-634: Add unit tests for comment and bookmark update methods.The methods
updateComment,updateBookmark, andappendCommenttrigger events that lack test coverage. Consider adding tests to verify:
- Event handlers are called when updates occur
- The
_unsavedflag is set correctly- Comments and bookmarks are updated properly
Also applies to: 640-640, 663-663
src/renderer/store/index.ts (2)
159-164: Previous review comment about error handling and debouncing is still applicable.The direct calls to
saveRecordForWebAppwithout error handling or debouncing could lead to silent failures and performance issues.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 160-160: src/renderer/store/index.ts#L160
Added line #L160 was not covered by tests
[warning] 163-163: src/renderer/store/index.ts#L163
Added line #L163 was not covered by tests
159-164: Add test coverage for new event handlers.The new event handlers for comment and bookmark updates lack test coverage, which could lead to undetected issues.
Run the following script to verify test coverage:
Would you like me to help generate unit tests for these event handlers?
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 160-160: src/renderer/store/index.ts#L160
Added line #L160 was not covered by tests
[warning] 163-163: src/renderer/store/index.ts#L163
Added line #L163 was not covered by tests
| <button @click="isMobileMenuVisible = true">Menu</button> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <FileMenu v-if="isMobileMenuVisible" @close="isMobileMenuVisible = false" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance menu button and dialog implementation.
The menu button and dialog implementation could be improved for better mobile UX and internationalization:
- <button @click="isMobileMenuVisible = true">Menu</button>
+ <button
+ @click="isMobileMenuVisible = true"
+ class="menu-button">
+ {{ $t('menu.title') }}
+ </button>
- <FileMenu v-if="isMobileMenuVisible" @close="isMobileMenuVisible = false" />
+ <FileMenu
+ v-if="isMobileMenuVisible"
+ @close="isMobileMenuVisible = false"
+ class="mobile-menu" />Add these styles:
.menu-button {
font-weight: 500;
}
.menu-button:active {
background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1);
}
.mobile-menu {
position: fixed;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
z-index: 1000;
}| private updateCommentHandler: UpdateCommentHandler | null = null; | ||
| private updateBookmarkHandler: UpdateBookmarkHandler | null = null; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using undefined instead of null for handler initialization.
The new handler properties follow the existing pattern, but there's an opportunity to improve type safety.
- private updateCommentHandler: UpdateCommentHandler | null = null;
- private updateBookmarkHandler: UpdateBookmarkHandler | null = null;
+ private updateCommentHandler: UpdateCommentHandler | undefined = undefined;
+ private updateBookmarkHandler: UpdateBookmarkHandler | undefined = undefined;This aligns with TypeScript best practices and the static analysis suggestion about avoiding confusing void types in unions.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| private updateCommentHandler: UpdateCommentHandler | null = null; | |
| private updateBookmarkHandler: UpdateBookmarkHandler | null = null; | |
| private updateCommentHandler: UpdateCommentHandler | undefined = undefined; | |
| private updateBookmarkHandler: UpdateBookmarkHandler | undefined = undefined; |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 313-313: void is confusing inside a union type.
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
(lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
sunfish-shogi
force-pushed
the
improve-mobile
branch
from
c72b00d
to
86a3cc5
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/renderer/view/main/MobileLayout.vue (1)
107-117: Document layout breakpoint ratios.The layout type selection uses magic numbers (0.5 and 1.6) for aspect ratio breakpoints. Consider extracting these as named constants with documentation explaining their significance and how they were determined.
Example implementation:
+// Aspect ratio breakpoints for layout transitions +const PORTRAIT_BREAKPOINT_BOTTOM = 0.5; // Switch to portrait when width < 50% of height +const PORTRAIT_BREAKPOINT_SIDE = 1.6; // Switch to portrait when width < 160% of height const boardLayoutType = computed(() => { if (showRecordViewOnBottom.value) { - return windowSize.width < windowSize.height * 0.5 + return windowSize.width < windowSize.height * PORTRAIT_BREAKPOINT_BOTTOM ? BoardLayoutType.PORTRAIT : BoardLayoutType.COMPACT; } else { - return windowSize.width < windowSize.height * 1.6 + return windowSize.width < windowSize.height * PORTRAIT_BREAKPOINT_SIDE ? BoardLayoutType.PORTRAIT : BoardLayoutType.COMPACT; } });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- index.html (1 hunks)
- layout-manager.html (1 hunks)
- prompt.html (1 hunks)
- src/renderer/App.vue (1 hunks)
- src/renderer/store/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/renderer/store/record.ts (6 hunks)
- src/renderer/view/main/CustomLayout.vue (1 hunks)
- src/renderer/view/main/MobileControls.vue (1 hunks)
- src/renderer/view/main/MobileLayout.vue (2 hunks)
- src/renderer/view/main/RecordPane.vue (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- index.html
- layout-manager.html
- prompt.html
- src/renderer/App.vue
- src/renderer/view/main/CustomLayout.vue
- src/renderer/view/main/RecordPane.vue
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/renderer/view/main/MobileControls.vue (1)
Learnt from: sunfish-shogi PR: sunfish-shogi/electron-shogi#982 File: src/renderer/view/main/MobileControls.vue:23-32 Timestamp: 2024-10-25T15:44:42.429Z Learning: In Vue 3's `<script setup>` context, reactive variables declared are automatically cleaned up upon component unmounting, so manual cleanup in `onUnmounted` is unnecessary.
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
src/renderer/store/index.ts
[warning] 160-160: src/renderer/store/index.ts#L160
Added line #L160 was not covered by tests
[warning] 163-163: src/renderer/store/index.ts#L163
Added line #L163 was not covered by testssrc/renderer/store/record.ts
[warning] 640-640: src/renderer/store/record.ts#L640
Added line #L640 was not covered by tests
[warning] 842-843: src/renderer/store/record.ts#L842-L843
Added lines #L842 - L843 were not covered by tests
[warning] 847-850: src/renderer/store/record.ts#L847-L850
Added lines #L847 - L850 were not covered by tests
🪛 Biome
src/renderer/store/record.ts
[error] 313-313: void is confusing inside a union type.
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
(lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/renderer/view/main/MobileControls.vue (1)
1-43: Verify mobile layout behavior across different orientations.Let's ensure the component handles different mobile orientations and aspect ratios as mentioned in the PR objectives.
✅ Verification successful
Mobile layout implementation is properly handled
The component is well-integrated into a responsive mobile layout system:
- MobileLayout.vue implements dynamic orientation handling through
showRecordViewOnBottomcomputed property- Responsive sizing is managed through:
- Dynamic control height calculation based on screen dimensions
- Automatic layout switching between portrait and compact modes
- Window resize event handling with debouncing
- The controls maintain consistent sizing with
width: 100%and proportional icon scaling atheight: 68%The implementation appropriately handles different mobile orientations and aspect ratios through computed properties and reactive window size monitoring.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for responsive design implementation across the codebase # Test 1: Look for media queries handling different orientations echo "Checking for orientation-specific styles..." rg -l "orientation: (portrait|landscape)" --type css --type vue # Test 2: Check for viewport meta tags echo "Checking for viewport meta tags..." rg -l "viewport" --type html # Test 3: Look for responsive utilities or breakpoint definitions echo "Checking for responsive utilities..." rg -l "(sm|md|lg|xl):" --type vue --type cssLength of output: 834
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's modify our search to handle Vue files correctly and check for responsive design patterns # Check for orientation and responsive styles in all files echo "Checking for orientation and responsive styles..." rg -l "orientation:|@media" --type-add 'vue:*.vue' --type vue # Check for mobile-specific class names and styles echo "Checking mobile-specific patterns..." rg -l "mobile|responsive|screen" --type-add 'vue:*.vue' --type vue # Look specifically at the main layout file echo "Checking main layout implementation..." rg "class.*controls" --type-add 'vue:*.vue' --type vue -A 5 # Check for any existing mobile-specific components echo "Finding mobile-specific components..." fd -e vue -e js -e ts . | rg -i "mobile"Length of output: 1818
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's examine the mobile-specific components and their responsive handling # Check SimpleBoardView.vue for its media queries echo "Checking SimpleBoardView.vue media queries..." rg "@media" src/renderer/view/primitive/SimpleBoardView.vue -A 3 -B 1 # Examine MobileLayout.vue to understand the overall mobile structure echo "Checking MobileLayout.vue content..." cat src/renderer/view/main/MobileLayout.vue # Look for any responsive class definitions in style files echo "Checking for responsive classes..." rg "\.full|\.row|\.controls" --type-add 'vue:*.vue' --type vue -A 2Length of output: 5694
src/renderer/view/main/MobileLayout.vue (1)
7-7: LGTM! Responsive layout implementation looks good.The dynamic layout-type binding and conditional rendering of MobileControls component with appropriate height calculation enhances the mobile responsiveness.
Also applies to: 10-13
src/renderer/store/record.ts (4)
301-302: LGTM!The new handler types follow the established pattern and are well-defined.
634-634: LGTM!The handler calls are correctly placed after state updates in the respective methods.
Also applies to: 640-640, 663-663
798-816: Add test coverage for new event handlers.The new event handler registration for
updateCommentandupdateBookmarklacks test coverage. Consider adding tests to verify:
- Handler registration
- Event triggering
- Handler cleanup
312-313: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider using
undefinedinstead ofnullfor handler initialization.Following TypeScript best practices and static analysis recommendations:
- private updateCommentHandler: UpdateCommentHandler | null = null; - private updateBookmarkHandler: UpdateBookmarkHandler | null = null; + private updateCommentHandler: UpdateCommentHandler | undefined = undefined; + private updateBookmarkHandler: UpdateBookmarkHandler | undefined = undefined;Likely invalid or redundant comment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 313-313: void is confusing inside a union type.
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
(lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
src/renderer/store/index.ts (1)
159-164:⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling and test coverage for new event handlers.
The new event handlers for comments and bookmarks lack error handling and test coverage.
The previous review comment about adding error handling and debouncing is still valid. Additionally, please add test coverage for these new handlers to ensure their reliability.
Apply this diff to implement error handling:
.on("updateComment", () => { - saveRecordForWebApp(this.record); + saveRecordForWebApp(this.record).catch((error) => { + useErrorStore().add("Failed to save comment update: " + error); + }); }) .on("updateBookmark", () => { - saveRecordForWebApp(this.record); + saveRecordForWebApp(this.record).catch((error) => { + useErrorStore().add("Failed to save bookmark update: " + error); + }); })#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for test coverage of the new event handlers # Test: Search for test files covering these handlers rg -l "updateComment|updateBookmark" "src/**/*test*"🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 160-160: src/renderer/store/index.ts#L160
Added line #L160 was not covered by tests
[warning] 163-163: src/renderer/store/index.ts#L163
Added line #L163 was not covered by tests
| <style scoped> | ||
| .controls button { | ||
| font-size: 100%; | ||
| width: 100%; | ||
| height: 100%; | ||
| } | ||
| .controls button .icon { | ||
| height: 68%; | ||
| } | ||
| </style> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance mobile-specific styles.
The current styles could be improved for better mobile interaction:
<style scoped>
.controls button {
font-size: 100%;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
+ min-height: 44px; /* Ensure minimum tap target size */
+ touch-action: manipulation; /* Disable double-tap zoom */
+ transition: transform 0.1s ease;
}
+
+.controls button:active {
+ transform: scale(0.95);
+ background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1);
+}
+
.controls button .icon {
height: 68%;
+ pointer-events: none; /* Prevent touch event issues on icons */
}
</style>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <style scoped> | |
| .controls button { | |
| font-size: 100%; | |
| width: 100%; | |
| height: 100%; | |
| } | |
| .controls button .icon { | |
| height: 68%; | |
| } | |
| </style> | |
| <style scoped> | |
| .controls button { | |
| font-size: 100%; | |
| width: 100%; | |
| height: 100%; | |
| min-height: 44px; /* Ensure minimum tap target size */ | |
| touch-action: manipulation; /* Disable double-tap zoom */ | |
| transition: transform 0.1s ease; | |
| } | |
| .controls button:active { | |
| transform: scale(0.95); | |
| background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); | |
| } | |
| .controls button .icon { | |
| height: 68%; | |
| pointer-events: none; /* Prevent touch event issues on icons */ | |
| } | |
| </style> |
| <script setup lang="ts"> | ||
| import { IconType } from "@/renderer/assets/icons"; | ||
| import { useStore } from "@/renderer/store"; | ||
| import Icon from "@/renderer/view/primitive/Icon.vue"; | ||
| import FileMenu from "@/renderer/view/menu/FileMenu.vue"; | ||
| import { ref } from "vue"; | ||
|
|
||
| const store = useStore(); | ||
| const isMobileMenuVisible = ref(false); | ||
| </script> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance type safety and store usage.
Consider improving type safety and store usage patterns:
<script setup lang="ts">
import { IconType } from "@/renderer/assets/icons";
-import { useStore } from "@/renderer/store";
+import type { Store } from "@/renderer/store";
+import { useStore } from "@/renderer/store";
import Icon from "@/renderer/view/primitive/Icon.vue";
import FileMenu from "@/renderer/view/menu/FileMenu.vue";
import { ref } from "vue";
-const store = useStore();
+const store: Store = useStore();
const isMobileMenuVisible = ref<boolean>(false);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| <div class="full row controls"> | ||
| <button @click="store.changePly(0)"> | ||
| <Icon :icon="IconType.FIRST" /> | ||
| </button> | ||
| <button @click="store.goBack()"> | ||
| <Icon :icon="IconType.BACK" /> | ||
| </button> | ||
| <button @click="store.goForward()"> | ||
| <Icon :icon="IconType.NEXT" /> | ||
| </button> | ||
| <button @click="store.changePly(Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER)"> | ||
| <Icon :icon="IconType.LAST" /> | ||
| </button> | ||
| <button @click="store.removeCurrentMove()"><Icon :icon="IconType.DELETE" /></button> | ||
| <button @click="isMobileMenuVisible = true">Menu</button> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance mobile touch interaction and semantic structure.
The controls section could benefit from improved mobile interaction and semantic structure:
- Add touch event handling for better mobile experience
- Use semantic HTML elements for navigation controls
- <div class="full row controls">
+ <nav class="full row controls" role="navigation" aria-label="Game controls">
- <button @click="store.changePly(0)">
+ <button
+ @click="store.changePly(0)"
+ @touchstart.prevent="store.changePly(0)">
<Icon :icon="IconType.FIRST" />
</button>
- <button @click="store.goBack()">
+ <button
+ @click="store.goBack()"
+ @touchstart.prevent="store.goBack()">
<Icon :icon="IconType.BACK" />
</button>
<!-- Similar changes for other buttons -->
- </div>
+ </nav>Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| :value="commentEditorMode" | ||
| @change=" | ||
| (value) => { | ||
| commentEditorMode = value; | ||
| } | ||
| " | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix ref access in ToggleButton component.
The commentEditorMode is a ref but it's not being accessed correctly in the template. When using refs in template expressions, Vue automatically unwraps them, but in event handlers, you need to explicitly use .value.
Apply this diff to fix the ref access:
<ToggleButton
label="コメント編集モード"
:height="toggleHeight"
:value="commentEditorMode"
@change="
(value) => {
- commentEditorMode = value;
+ commentEditorMode.value = value;
}
"
/>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| :value="commentEditorMode" | |
| @change=" | |
| (value) => { | |
| commentEditorMode = value; | |
| } | |
| " | |
| /> | |
| :value="commentEditorMode" | |
| @change=" | |
| (value) => { | |
| commentEditorMode.value = value; | |
| } | |
| " | |
| /> |
| const toggleHeight = 24; | ||
| const minRecordViewWidth = 300; | ||
| const minRecordViewHeight = 200; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider making toggle height responsive.
The toggleHeight is hardcoded to 24 pixels, which might not be optimal for all screen sizes and densities. Consider making it responsive similar to how controlPaneHeight is calculated.
Example implementation:
-const toggleHeight = 24;
+const toggleHeight = computed(() => Math.min(windowSize.height * 0.03, windowSize.width * 0.06));Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
説明 / Description
チェックリスト / Checklist
npm testpassednpm run lintwas applied without warnings/docs/webappnot included (except release branch)console.lognot included (except script file)Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes