Skip to content

[EPIC] LTI 1.3 integration #2613

Description

@tibroc

Context

As proposed in #2432, we are exploring launching Docs directly from a Learning Management System (LMS) via the LTI 1.3 standard. In LTI terms, the LMS is the Platform and Docs is the Tool.

This is a meta issue: it should hold the scope, the design decisions and the current state of the work. Implementation will happen in sub-issues that will be linked here. Task-specific discussions should then take place in the corresponding sub-issues.

Goals

  • A teacher can add a Docs activity to a course; learners click it and land in the document, already authenticated, with the right permissions.
  • No separate account creation and no second login step.
  • Works with any LTI 1.3 certified LMS (e.g. Moodle, Stud.IP) — no LMS-specific code.

Target scenarios

  1. Shared course doc — one document per activity, all enrolled learners can edit collaboratively
  2. Handout — one document, instructors edit, learners read
  3. Per-learner doc — each learner gets their own document, instructors can read all of them
  4. Deep linking — the instructor picks or creates the document from the LMS content picker

Open questions

  1. Identity: Ideally accounts in LTI can map to accounts from single-sign-on system like keycloak.
  2. Ownership: Who owns a document created through a launch — the instructor, or the instance? What happens when the instructor leaves? It would be good to have a admin account that owns all documents created via LTI.
  3. Lifecycle: Does the document outlive the course? Can learners still reach it after the course ends? Data retention expectations differ per institution.
  4. Role mapping: how do LTI roles map to roles/rights in Docs?

Activity

  1. changed the title [-]LTI 1.3 integration[/-] [+][EPIC] LTI 1.3 integration[/+] on Aug 28, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions