Skip to content

Update for LM2015 transition model #100

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 9, 2022
Merged

Update for LM2015 transition model #100

merged 6 commits into from
Dec 9, 2022

Conversation

rois1995
Copy link
Contributor

@rois1995 rois1995 commented Dec 7, 2022

Hi everyone,

This work updates the transition portion with the LM2015 model and the SA-LM coupling following PR #1810.

I am adding information on the Physical Definitions regarding the LM_OPTIONS entries.

I'll also add validation regarding SA-LM coupling.

@rois1995 rois1995 changed the base branch from master to develop December 7, 2022 19:23
Co-authored-by: Pedro Gomes <38071223+pcarruscag@users.noreply.github.com>
- `LM2015` - Correction to include stationary crossflow instabilities. It has to be used only in 3D problems. The RMS of roughness used in this model has to be set through the separate option `HROUGHNESS`.
- Correlations:
- `MALAN` - This is the default correlation when the LM model is coupled with the `SA` turbulence model.
- `SULUKSNA` - This should be used only if the `SST` model is used. It requires a formulation of
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

incomplete sentence

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After this feel free to merge, thank you for the update

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I also added some figures for the validation of the E387 test case. Please, check if those are good, and then I'll merge this, thank you.

Copy link
Member

@pcarruscag pcarruscag left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep looks good

@rois1995 rois1995 merged commit d554db9 into develop Dec 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants