-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue 2196 fix unittest warnings #2343
Issue 2196 fix unittest warnings #2343
Conversation
…nto issue-2196_fix-unittest-warnings
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2343 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 21.2% 21.23% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 283 283
Lines 6155 6155
Branches 736 714 -22
==========================================
+ Hits 1305 1307 +2
- Misses 4271 4303 +32
+ Partials 579 545 -34
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
// <a> and <pre> elements, which is why <div> | ||
// is used as the outputted element when parsing | ||
// marksy content rather than <p>. | ||
return <div style={style}>{props.children}</div>; | ||
} | ||
|
||
P.defaultProps = defaultProps; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we should change the component name too? Looks like it's now called P
, but renders a DIV
.
Thanks to the comment we do know why though 👍 .
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah it would make sense to change it, but in that case, do we go ahead and distinguish when the component is used as a wrapper and when it's just used as <p> tag? Or if not, what do we rename this to?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great!
@syneva-runyan can you do the same for release/3.3
branch after we merge this PR?
@Hypnosphi sure. |
@syneva-runyan please uncomment those lines when making the PR for |
Issue: #2196
What I did
Fixed warning being outputting from unit tests.