Add support for STM32G4 chips #822
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Merge most recent version of STLink into the fork.
Update fork with recent upstream changes.
Merge recent changes from upstream
|
Redirected to develop branch. Closes #822. |
|
@WRansohoff: Thx for your contribution! |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This uses the same logic as the G0/WB chips. And the G0 / G4 series seem to use the same general Flash register layout, so I merged some of those registers and bit fields.
I also tested this with a program which spans more than 3 pages on an STM32G431 and an STM32G071 'Nucleo-64' board, so hopefully this change will work the first time unlike the G0/WB support.
Knock on wood...