Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SNIP-9 implementation #1208

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024
Merged

SNIP-9 implementation #1208

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024

Conversation

penovicp
Copy link
Collaborator

Motivation and Resolution

Branch for the full SNIP-9 implementation, should be merged once PR #1202 is merged.

@penovicp penovicp marked this pull request as draft August 26, 2024 09:26
* chore: adjust for erc165

* feat: finalize SNIP-9 outside execution implementation

* chore: implement changes requested by Ivan
@penovicp penovicp marked this pull request as ready for review August 27, 2024 03:48
@penovicp penovicp merged commit e3c80c5 into develop Aug 27, 2024
3 checks passed
@penovicp penovicp deleted the snip-9 branch August 27, 2024 03:52
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2024
# [6.13.0](v6.12.1...v6.13.0) (2024-08-27)

### Bug Fixes

* repair enum type lookup for typed data hashing ([36f8c3c](36f8c3c))
* sync cryptographic dependencies ([da20310](da20310))

### Features

* implement SNIP-9 outside execution functionality ([#1208](#1208)) ([e3c80c5](e3c80c5)), closes [#1111](#1111) [#1202](#1202)
* improve message verification utilities ([#1198](#1198)) ([bdad9a5](bdad9a5))
Copy link

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 6.13.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants