Skip to content

docs: Document workaround to disable SNI checks #834

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

lfrancke
Copy link
Member

@lfrancke lfrancke commented Aug 13, 2025

Description

Important

This should only be merged once stackabletech/docker-images#1225 is merged

Document workaround to disable SNI checks.
I took the opportunity to rewrite the entire FAQ entry.

Note

This also contains an unrelated change to fix https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2025-0047 otherwise the build wouldn't work

@lfrancke lfrancke enabled auto-merge August 13, 2025 21:21
@lfrancke lfrancke moved this to Development: Waiting for Review in Stackable Engineering Aug 13, 2025
@lfrancke lfrancke self-assigned this Aug 13, 2025
@lfrancke lfrancke disabled auto-merge August 13, 2025 21:26
sbernauer
sbernauer previously approved these changes Aug 14, 2025
Copy link
Member

@sbernauer sbernauer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but we should hold of merging until stackabletech/docker-images#1225 is merged.

Can you please also add a docs: prefix to the PR title? :)
If you have the time I would also be happy about a changelog entry that you can now disable the check via configOverrides (yeah, this is a docker-image thing, but users are not going to read docker-images changelog)

@lfrancke lfrancke changed the title Document workaround to disable SNI checks docs: Document workaround to disable SNI checks Aug 14, 2025
@lfrancke
Copy link
Member Author

I thought about that and wasn't sure.
We can also consider whether we want to expose this as a CRD flag.....let's talk about it at the daily and decide how to proceed.

@sbernauer sbernauer moved this from Development: Waiting for Review to Development: In Review in Stackable Engineering Aug 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Development: In Review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants