Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for many clozures within a single flashcard #796

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Stefanuk12
Copy link

Duplicate of #733

@ronzulu
Copy link
Collaborator

ronzulu commented Jan 9, 2024

Hi @Stefanuk12

I'm wondering if it would be more accurate to call this:

  • "Support for all clozures within a single flashcard" ("all" instead of "many")? Or
  • "Hide all clozures within a single flashcard"?

When turning on the new option, all clozes are included in the one flashcard. Is that correct?

Also, do you think that a global option is the best way to go?

I've just noticed your other PR #769, which looks really interesting and very flexible. I'll try and have a look in the next week or so.

Is there anything this PR can do that #769 cannot?

Cheers
Ronny

@Stefanuk12
Copy link
Author

Yes, this would effectively remove siblings and place them all in one card.

Anki syntax support would be more flexible and possibly a better solution. The only drawback is the ugly syntax. Using a highlight is a lot more concise and convenient. Others have suggested labelling the highlight with [^1] to enable this PRs functionality so that could also be done. To slightly remedy the ugly syntax, my feature request about the custom reading view could help.

Mainly, it's a tradeoff from flexibility and convenience.

An alternative solution to this PR could be to assign different "methods" to different functionalities. For example, using ** would show the default behaviour and using == would show this PRs behaviour.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants