- 
        Couldn't load subscription status. 
- Fork 0
Try out return value validators #8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Open
      
      
            sshader
  wants to merge
  1
  commit into
  main
  
    
      
        
          
  
    
      Choose a base branch
      
     
    
      
        
      
      
        
          
          
        
        
          
            
              
              
              
  
           
        
        
          
            
              
              
           
        
       
     
  
        
          
            
          
            
          
        
       
    
      
from
sshader-return-value-validators
  
      
      
   
  
    
  
  
  
 
  
      
    base: main
Could not load branches
            
              
  
    Branch not found: {{ refName }}
  
            
                
      Loading
              
            Could not load tags
            
            
              Nothing to show
            
              
  
            
                
      Loading
              
            Are you sure you want to change the base?
            Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
            and old review comments may become outdated.
          
          
                
     Open
            
            
          Conversation
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
    | The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 
 | 
| Example of one of the errors I got (I had v.id("Game") instead of v.id("Games"))  | 
| I think this is better (with the simplified overloads)  | 
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
      
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
This is trying out the soon to be launched output validators as they are. I made the relevant types public in the Convex repo, ran
npm pack, tweakedconvex-helpersso I could get custom functions working, rannpm pack, and then installed both in this project.Notes:
v.id("Game")instead ofv.id("Games")and the real error was pretty buried (I'll grab a screenshot).Doctype, especially with Ents. I ended up copying stuff from my schema, manually adding system fields (I think there's an existing helper for that), and then manually adding in fields for any ent edges. At one point I copy pasted from the saved schema in the dashboard since that included the ent edges for me.returns: v.object({ a: v.string(), b: v.string() }), handler: () => { return { a: "a", b: "b", c: "c" } }will compile (but fail at runtime). This is also true for arg validators, but it means that there's not really any help from TypeScript when it comes to remembering to add in_id, or adding in a property in a helper and forgetting to propagate that all the way to the return value validator.PaginationResult(had to reconstruct the type manually, but with validators)returns: v.null()