Conversation
- Introduced a new section in the README for the class diagram. - Documented the structure and relationships of core agents and tools including: - Agent - Tool - codingTeamNetwork - codingA2ACoordinator - codeArchitectAgent - codeReviewerAgent - testEngineerAgent - refactoringAgent - Various coding tools (codeAnalysisTool, codeSearchTool, etc.)
|
Keep this PR in a mergeable state → Learn moreAll Green is an AI agent that automatically: ✅ Addresses code review comments ✅ Fixes failing CI checks ✅ Resolves merge conflicts |
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings. WalkthroughAdded a new "Class Diagram" section to README.md featuring a Mermaid diagram that illustrates the architecture of Agent and Tool entities, including specialized agent classes (coding team network, coordinator, architect, reviewer, test engineer, refactoring) and corresponding tool classes with their inheritance, composition, and association relationships. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes
Poem
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @ssdeanx, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the project's documentation by introducing a comprehensive class diagram into the README.md. This diagram provides a clear visual representation of the core AgentStack agents and tools, outlining their properties and interconnections, which will greatly aid in understanding the system's architecture and component relationships. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
🤖 Hi @ssdeanx, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details. |
Reviewer's GuideAdds a new README section containing a Mermaid-based class diagram that documents the structure and relationships of the core AgentStack agents and tools. Class diagram for core AgentStack agents and toolsclassDiagram
class Agent {
+string id
+string name
+string description
+function instructions runtimeContext
+model model
+memory memory
+tools tools
+agents agents
+workflows workflows
+scorers scorers
+number maxRetries
}
class Tool {
+string id
+string description
+inputSchema inputSchema
+outputSchema outputSchema
+function execute context
}
class codingTeamNetwork {
+string id
+string name
+string description
+agents coding_agents
}
class codingA2ACoordinator {
+string id
+string name
+string description
+agents coding_agents
}
class codeArchitectAgent {
+string id
+string name
+string description
+UserTier userTier
+string language
+string projectRoot
}
class codeReviewerAgent {
+string id
+string name
+string description
}
class testEngineerAgent {
+string id
+string name
+string description
}
class refactoringAgent {
+string id
+string name
+string description
}
class codeAnalysisTool {
+string id
+string description
+CodeAnalysisInput inputSchema
+CodeAnalysisOutput outputSchema
}
class codeSearchTool {
+string id
+string description
+CodeSearchInput inputSchema
+CodeSearchOutput outputSchema
}
class diffReviewTool {
+string id
+string description
+DiffReviewInput inputSchema
+DiffReviewOutput outputSchema
}
class multiStringEditTool {
+string id
+string description
+MultiStringEditInput inputSchema
+MultiStringEditOutput outputSchema
}
class testGeneratorTool {
+string id
+string description
+TestGeneratorInput inputSchema
+TestGeneratorOutput outputSchema
}
Agent <|-- codingTeamNetwork
Agent <|-- codingA2ACoordinator
Agent <|-- codeArchitectAgent
Agent <|-- codeReviewerAgent
Agent <|-- testEngineerAgent
Agent <|-- refactoringAgent
Tool <|-- codeAnalysisTool
Tool <|-- codeSearchTool
Tool <|-- diffReviewTool
Tool <|-- multiStringEditTool
Tool <|-- testGeneratorTool
codingTeamNetwork o-- codeArchitectAgent
codingTeamNetwork o-- codeReviewerAgent
codingTeamNetwork o-- testEngineerAgent
codingTeamNetwork o-- refactoringAgent
codingA2ACoordinator o-- codeArchitectAgent
codingA2ACoordinator o-- codeReviewerAgent
codingA2ACoordinator o-- testEngineerAgent
codingA2ACoordinator o-- refactoringAgent
codeArchitectAgent --> codeAnalysisTool
codeArchitectAgent --> codeSearchTool
codeReviewerAgent --> codeAnalysisTool
codeReviewerAgent --> diffReviewTool
codeReviewerAgent --> codeSearchTool
testEngineerAgent --> codeAnalysisTool
testEngineerAgent --> testGeneratorTool
testEngineerAgent --> codeSearchTool
refactoringAgent --> multiStringEditTool
refactoringAgent --> codeAnalysisTool
refactoringAgent --> diffReviewTool
refactoringAgent --> codeSearchTool
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey there - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
- Consider normalizing class names to a consistent convention (e.g., PascalCase for all classes like CodingTeamNetwork, CodingA2ACoordinator) to better align with typical UML/Mermaid style and improve readability.
- The class members mix explicit types (e.g.,
+string id) and untyped fields (e.g.,+description); it may be clearer to either add types for all properties or drop types entirely for consistency in the diagram.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- Consider normalizing class names to a consistent convention (e.g., PascalCase for all classes like CodingTeamNetwork, CodingA2ACoordinator) to better align with typical UML/Mermaid style and improve readability.
- The class members mix explicit types (e.g., `+string id`) and untyped fields (e.g., `+description`); it may be clearer to either add types for all properties or drop types entirely for consistency in the diagram.Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
Greptile OverviewGreptile SummaryThis PR adds a comprehensive class diagram to the README.md file to document the core architecture of AgentStack's agents and tools. The diagram uses Mermaid syntax to visualize the relationships between the base Important Files Changed
Confidence score: 5/5
|
![greptile-apps[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
🤖 I'm sorry @ssdeanx, but I was unable to process your request. Please see the logs for more details. |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a valuable class diagram to the README, significantly improving the documentation of the core agent and tool architecture. The diagram is well-structured and accurately reflects the relationships between components. I have one suggestion to enhance the consistency of how agent properties are represented, which will make the diagram even more informative. Overall, this is an excellent contribution.
| class codeArchitectAgent { | ||
| +id = "code-architect" | ||
| +name = "Code Architect Agent" | ||
| +description | ||
| +UserTier userTier | ||
| +string language | ||
| +string projectRoot | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| class codeReviewerAgent { | ||
| +id = "code-reviewer" | ||
| +name = "Code Reviewer Agent" | ||
| +description | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| class testEngineerAgent { | ||
| +id = "test-engineer" | ||
| +name = "Test Engineer Agent" | ||
| +description | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| class refactoringAgent { | ||
| +id = "refactoring" | ||
| +name = "Refactoring Agent" | ||
| +description | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This class diagram is a great addition for understanding the agent architecture.
There's a small inconsistency in how agent properties derived from runtimeContext are displayed. The codeArchitectAgent class includes userTier, language, and projectRoot, but other agents like codeReviewerAgent, testEngineerAgent, and refactoringAgent—which also use these context properties—do not have them listed in the diagram.
For better consistency and to make the diagram more informative about what context each agent uses, I suggest adding these properties to the other agent classes as well. This will make it clearer at a glance what contextual information each agent depends on.
class codeArchitectAgent {
+id = "code-architect"
+name = "Code Architect Agent"
+description
+UserTier userTier
+string language
+string projectRoot
}
class codeReviewerAgent {
+id = "code-reviewer"
+name = "Code Reviewer Agent"
+description
+UserTier userTier
+string language
}
class testEngineerAgent {
+id = "test-engineer"
+name = "Test Engineer Agent"
+description
+UserTier userTier
+string language
}
class refactoringAgent {
+id = "refactoring"
+name = "Refactoring Agent"
+description
+UserTier userTier
+string language
+string projectRoot
}There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This pull request adds comprehensive documentation to the README by introducing a Mermaid class diagram that visualizes the core AgentStack architecture. The diagram illustrates the relationships between base classes (Agent, Tool), specialized coding agents, coordination components, and their associated tools.
Key Changes
- Added a new "Class Diagram" section to document the agent and tool architecture
- Documented 6 agent implementations (including 2 networks/coordinators and 4 specialized coding agents)
- Documented 5 coding tools with their relationships to agents
- Used Mermaid syntax to create an interactive, visual representation of the system architecture
| +string id | ||
| +string name | ||
| +string description | ||
| +function instructions(runtimeContext) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The instructions method should use proper type annotations in the class diagram. Consider +instructions(runtimeContext: RuntimeContext): object instead of +function instructions(runtimeContext) for better clarity and consistency with TypeScript conventions.
| +function instructions(runtimeContext) | |
| +instructions(runtimeContext: RuntimeContext): object |
| +string description | ||
| +inputSchema | ||
| +outputSchema | ||
| +function execute(context) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The execute method should use proper type annotations in the class diagram. Consider +execute(context: InputContext): Promise<Output> instead of +function execute(context) for better clarity and consistency with TypeScript conventions.
| +function execute(context) | |
| +execute(context: InputContext): Promise<Output> |
| +model | ||
| +memory | ||
| +tools | ||
| +agents | ||
| +workflows | ||
| +scorers | ||
| +maxRetries |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Several Agent properties lack type information in the class diagram. For clarity and consistency with the codebase, consider adding types:
+model: Model+memory: Memory+tools: Record<string, Tool>+agents: Record<string, Agent>+workflows: Record<string, Workflow>+scorers: Record<string, Scorer>+maxRetries: number
| +model | |
| +memory | |
| +tools | |
| +agents | |
| +workflows | |
| +scorers | |
| +maxRetries | |
| +model: Model | |
| +memory: Memory | |
| +tools: Record<string, Tool> | |
| +agents: Record<string, Agent> | |
| +workflows: Record<string, Workflow> | |
| +scorers: Record<string, Scorer> | |
| +maxRetries: number |
| +inputSchema | ||
| +outputSchema |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tool properties lack type information in the class diagram. For clarity and consistency, consider adding types:
+inputSchema: ZodSchema+outputSchema: ZodSchema
| +inputSchema | |
| +outputSchema | |
| +inputSchema: ZodSchema | |
| +outputSchema: ZodSchema |
| +UserTier userTier | ||
| +string language | ||
| +string projectRoot |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The properties userTier, language, and projectRoot are not direct properties of codeArchitectAgent. These values are accessed from the RuntimeContext within the agent's instructions function, not stored as agent properties. Consider removing these lines or clarifying that they are runtime context values, not agent properties.
| +UserTier userTier | |
| +string language | |
| +string projectRoot | |
| // Note: userTier, language, and projectRoot are accessed from RuntimeContext in instructions, not stored as agent properties. |
1 participant
Summary by Sourcery
Documentation: