Skip to content

Conversation

smacker
Copy link
Contributor

@smacker smacker commented Feb 22, 2018

Implements functionality for #149.

Based on:
#152
#154
#156

Now the list of experiments is default page when user login.
Annotation works fine for experiments with id > 1.

Review link still points on the first experiment though. It's possible to open review for other experiments changing url, but no link. Most probably the experiments list page should be modified and links should be there. After we can remove the one from top bar. But we don't have wireframes for that.

@smacker smacker requested a review from bzz February 22, 2018 16:02
@bzz
Copy link
Contributor

bzz commented Feb 23, 2018

It's quite hard to tell but I assume it's 108d583 that needs to be reviewed, would appreciate if you could you please rebase and verify this assumption.

Would you mind, in such cases when work is based on many other PRs listing the commits relevant for review if possible? That will speed up the reviews.

@smacker smacker force-pushed the fe_multiple_experiments_support branch from 108d583 to 20ce24d Compare February 23, 2018 09:45
@smacker
Copy link
Contributor Author

smacker commented Feb 23, 2018

@bzz commit with name Fe multiple experiments support should be reviewed (hash is changing after every rebase)

@bzz bzz requested a review from dpordomingo February 26, 2018 10:14
Copy link
Contributor

@bzz bzz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

20ce24d SGTM

Signed-off-by: Maxim Sukharev <maxim@sourced.tech>
@smacker smacker force-pushed the fe_multiple_experiments_support branch from 20ce24d to d225a6f Compare February 26, 2018 18:32
Copy link
Contributor

@dpordomingo dpordomingo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, could you rebase and merge @smacker ?

@smacker smacker merged commit 6a5c280 into src-d:master Feb 26, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants