Skip to content

WorkflowTesting changes to support GUWT #11

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dhavalshreyas
Copy link
Contributor

The new SignalProducerWorker will use a SignalProducerWorkerWorkflow to run SignalProducer.

To be able to build ExpectedSignalProducerWorker, ExpectedWorkflow will need to support custom matching (b/w the expected and the actual Workflow) and assertions.

Changes in this PR will enable this.

@dhavalshreyas dhavalshreyas force-pushed the dhaval/workflowTestingChanges branch from e02926f to 03c421b Compare June 26, 2020 20:14
@dhavalshreyas dhavalshreyas force-pushed the dhaval/workflowTestingChanges branch from 03c421b to 7539563 Compare June 26, 2020 20:16
let rendering: Any
let output: Any?
let doesMatch: (_ childWorkflow: Any, _ childKey: String) -> Bool
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This sounds strange to me. Can we call this matches instead?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Closing this one, in favor of #15

@dhavalshreyas
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing this one in favor of #15

@dhavalshreyas dhavalshreyas deleted the dhaval/workflowTestingChanges branch October 20, 2020 23:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants