-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Adapt tests that expected a DuplicateKeyException #2113
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
marcusdacoregio
merged 1 commit into
spring-projects:3.0.x
from
marcusdacoregio:gh-2108
Jul 20, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | ||
| /* | ||
| * Copyright 2014-2020 the original author or authors. | ||
| * Copyright 2014-2022 the original author or authors. | ||
| * | ||
| * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); | ||
| * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. | ||
|
|
@@ -500,6 +500,9 @@ public int getBatchSize() { | |
| catch (DataIntegrityViolationException ex) { | ||
| // parent record not found - we are ignoring this error because we | ||
| // assume that a concurrent request has removed the session | ||
| if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) { | ||
| logger.trace("Not able to create session attributes", ex); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
|
|
@@ -517,6 +520,9 @@ public int getBatchSize() { | |
| catch (DataIntegrityViolationException ex) { | ||
| // parent record not found - we are ignoring this error because we | ||
| // assume that a concurrent request has removed the session | ||
| if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) { | ||
| logger.trace("Not able to create session attributes", ex); | ||
| } | ||
|
Comment on lines
+523
to
+525
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Same things to consider as in the other comment. |
||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good call to log this - I'd even consider logging it on debug level.
Minor nit: I'd move logging code beneath the comment block so that the intent of the whole
catchblock is described first (more readable IMO).