Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider removing XML configuration support #13271

Open
Tracked by #13266
jgrandja opened this issue Jun 2, 2023 · 1 comment
Open
Tracked by #13266

Consider removing XML configuration support #13271

jgrandja opened this issue Jun 2, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
theme: partner-use-cases Use cases we identified with a partner (an established contributor) type: breaks-passivity A change that breaks passivity with the previous release

Comments

@jgrandja
Copy link
Contributor

jgrandja commented Jun 2, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Providing both Java and XML configuration support requires higher maintenance overhead. We should consider removing XML configuration support in Spring Security 7.0, to help reduce the maintenance and support overhead.

Related gh-13266
@jgrandja jgrandja mentioned this issue Jun 2, 2023
Open
8 tasks
@jgrandja jgrandja added the type: breaks-passivity A change that breaks passivity with the previous release label Jun 2, 2023
@rwinch
Copy link
Member

rwinch commented Jun 12, 2023

I do not think we will do this unless Spring Framework does the same.

@jzheaux jzheaux mentioned this issue Jul 3, 2023
Open
@sjohnr sjohnr added the theme: partner-use-cases Use cases we identified with a partner (an established contributor) label Jul 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
theme: partner-use-cases Use cases we identified with a partner (an established contributor) type: breaks-passivity A change that breaks passivity with the previous release
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@rwinch @sjohnr @jgrandja