Fix typo and use of componentry #27852
Conversation
spring-projects-issues
added
the
status: waiting-for-triage
snicoll
added
type: documentation
| @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ | |||
| * setting of the <em>thread name prefix</em> of the {@code Executor}; this is because | |||
| * the {@code <task:executor>} element does not expose such an attribute. This | |||
| * demonstrates how the JavaConfig-based approach allows for maximum configurability | |||
| * through direct access to actual componentry. | |||
| * through direct access to actual component. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is not a typo: "componentry" is semantically correct here.
Although the wording could be improved, the suggested change is grammatically incorrect.
| @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ | |||
| * instead of a custom <em>{@code Trigger}</em> implementation; this is because the | |||
| * {@code task:} namespace {@code scheduled} cannot easily expose such support. This is | |||
| * but one demonstration how the code-based approach allows for maximum configurability | |||
| * through direct access to actual componentry. | |||
| * through direct access to actual component. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is not a typo: "componentry" is semantically correct here.
Although the wording could be improved, the suggested change is grammatically incorrect.
| @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ | |||
| * method will be invoked on each instance, delegating the {@code ServletContext} such | |||
| * that each instance may register and configure servlets such as Spring's | |||
| * {@code DispatcherServlet}, listeners such as Spring's {@code ContextLoaderListener}, | |||
| * or any other Servlet API componentry such as filters. | |||
| * or any other Servlet API component such as filters. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is not a typo: "componentry" is semantically correct here.
Although the wording could be improved, the suggested change is grammatically incorrect.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you review but can I ask a question in this word "component" change to the "componentry" means, because componentry is not in the dictionary
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is not a typo: "componentry" is semantically correct here.
Although the wording could be improved, the suggested change is grammatically incorrect.
I am also not the English native speaker,I can not understand at the word add ry means what,so how to change the word can grammatically correct.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
what dictionary are you using?
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/componentry
|
IMO, it is worth reviewing as the current phrasing isn't friendly to those, like me, who aren't English native speaker. |
|
@xixingya thanks for spotting these, I hope the polished phrasing is more accessible to everyone. |
👍
Yep, it's definitely more accessible to non-native speakers like that. Thanks. |
Fix lattery and componentry word