Skip to content

bugfix: Multi Relationships cannot get right conversion type #2974

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025
Merged

bugfix: Multi Relationships cannot get right conversion type #2974

merged 6 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

yangyaofei
Copy link
Contributor

fix issue #2973

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Nov 22, 2024
@meistermeier
Copy link
Collaborator

nvm the last commit. My github command line tool fooled me. But nothing to worry about :D

@meistermeier
Copy link
Collaborator

Sorry for the force pushes, wanted to get rid of the merge commit but also rebase on the current main branch to avoid potential merge problems in the future.

Signed-off-by: 杨耀飞 <yangyaofei@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: yangyaofei <yangyaofei@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: 杨耀飞 <yangyaofei@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: yangyaofei <yangyaofei@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: 杨耀飞 <yangyaofei@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: yangyaofei <yangyaofei@gmail.com>
…determ whether to persist type information

Signed-off-by: 杨耀飞 <yangyaofei@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: yangyaofei <yangyaofei@gmail.com>
@yangyaofei
Copy link
Contributor Author

@meistermeier force-pushed with Signed-off, now check is passed

Signed-off-by: Gerrit Meier <meistermeier@gmail.com>
@meistermeier
Copy link
Collaborator

I added some changes. If you are happy with this, I will go ahead and squash/merge it.
Ignore the missing DCO commit right now.

@yangyaofei
Copy link
Contributor Author

@meistermeier it looks great, go ahead do it. And if there is anything I need to do tell me.

@meistermeier meistermeier merged commit 7490d99 into spring-projects:main Jan 23, 2025
1 check failed
@meistermeier
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the contribution 🙇
This is now merged to the main branch.

meistermeier added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2025
Add an optional parameter to `@RelationshipProperties` that allows
users to persist the type information on this relationship.
This will allow SDN to detect the right class it needs to instantiate
if, due to abstraction of the implementation, no other information is available.

Closes #2973

Signed-off-by: 杨耀飞 <yangyaofei@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: yangyaofei <yangyaofei@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Meier <meistermeier@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gerrit Meier <meistermeier@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7490d99)
meistermeier added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2025
Add an optional parameter to `@RelationshipProperties` that allows
users to persist the type information on this relationship.
This will allow SDN to detect the right class it needs to instantiate
if, due to abstraction of the implementation, no other information is available.

Closes #2973

Signed-off-by: 杨耀飞 <yangyaofei@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: yangyaofei <yangyaofei@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Meier <meistermeier@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gerrit Meier <meistermeier@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7490d99)
meistermeier added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2025
Add an optional parameter to `@RelationshipProperties` that allows
users to persist the type information on this relationship.
This will allow SDN to detect the right class it needs to instantiate
if, due to abstraction of the implementation, no other information is available.

Closes #2973

Signed-off-by: 杨耀飞 <yangyaofei@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: yangyaofei <yangyaofei@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Meier <meistermeier@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gerrit Meier <meistermeier@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7490d99)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants