Skip to content

Conversation

@sjohnr
Copy link
Contributor

@sjohnr sjohnr commented Sep 17, 2021

Closes gh-176

@sjohnr sjohnr added status: duplicate A duplicate of another issue type: enhancement A general enhancement labels Sep 17, 2021
@sjohnr sjohnr added this to the 0.2.1 milestone Sep 17, 2021
@sjohnr sjohnr requested a review from jgrandja September 17, 2021 17:07
@sjohnr sjohnr force-pushed the gh-176 branch 2 times, most recently from 0603588 to 970ce39 Compare September 21, 2021 14:11
Copy link
Contributor

@idosal idosal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! The suggestions from my PR fit really well. Added a few minor comments for your consideration. Let me know if there's anything else I can help with.

@sjohnr sjohnr marked this pull request as ready for review September 21, 2021 19:52
@sjohnr
Copy link
Contributor Author

sjohnr commented Sep 21, 2021

@idosal Thanks! I've incorporated your original commits into this PR, as well as minor changes based on your feedback. (I'll squash the last commit before merging.)

@Insutanto
Copy link

Hi, When will this feature be released? I am waiting for it.

Copy link
Collaborator

@jgrandja jgrandja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR @sjohnr. Please see review comments.

@sjohnr sjohnr requested a review from jgrandja October 8, 2021 19:34
Copy link
Collaborator

@jgrandja jgrandja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the updates @sjohnr. Please see review comments.

@sjohnr
Copy link
Contributor Author

sjohnr commented Oct 19, 2021

@jgrandja I finished preliminary changes based on your feedback. I still need to solve the issued_at JSON number, and then I'll squash etc. But everything else has been worked on.

@sjohnr
Copy link
Contributor Author

sjohnr commented Oct 20, 2021

@jgrandja this is ready for final review. Thanks for the feedback!

@sjohnr sjohnr requested a review from jgrandja October 20, 2021 21:23
@yangyaofei
Copy link

I got a 401 when I use this.

The OAuth2 Client call userinfo only with jwt token, and because UserInfo filter behind the FilterSecurityInterceptor
the result always 401.

Is there anything I use wrong? I just use the default settings.

@sjohnr
Copy link
Contributor Author

sjohnr commented Oct 25, 2021

@yangyaofei See this integration test for an example of how to configure authorization server for user info.

@yangyaofei
Copy link

@sjohnr oh, thank you, when I add http.oauth2ResourceServer().jwt(); and jwtDecoder Bean to configure, it works great.

I'm looking forward to see this PR merged and release in 0.2.1, and then I can ues this in my productions, thank you again.

jgrandja added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2021
@jgrandja
Copy link
Collaborator

jgrandja commented Oct 25, 2021

Thanks for the updates @sjohnr. This is now in main!
FYI, I added a polish commit with some very minor updates.

@jgrandja jgrandja closed this Oct 25, 2021
@sjohnr sjohnr deleted the gh-176 branch October 25, 2021 17:02
jgrandja added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2021
doba16 pushed a commit to doba16/spring-authorization-server that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2023
doba16 pushed a commit to doba16/spring-authorization-server that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

status: duplicate A duplicate of another issue type: enhancement A general enhancement

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement UserInfo Endpoint

5 participants