e2e: Optimize and add e2e use cases for 'ip rule'

[ty-dc]

Thanks for contributing!

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #2823 (99c34d6) into main (3e3aede) will increase coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 99c34d6 differs from pull request most recent head d86eb75. Consider uploading reports for the commit d86eb75 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2823      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.05%   81.09%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          49       49              
  Lines        5336     5333       -3     
==========================================
  Hits         4325     4325              
+ Misses        854      852       -2     
+ Partials      157      156       -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	81.09% <ø> (+0.04%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

[ty-dc]

Please wait for issue #2901 to be fixed, it will be rebased when the fix is complete. and complete verification of the problem

[ty-dc]

Additional Ipv6 issues, let's wait for the PR ##2919 to be merged, and then rebase