Decode FORS indices similarly to WOTS#51
Conversation
|
Oops, David Cooper is right; this does flip the bit order for each leaf. What we want is: indices[i] ^= ((m[offset >> 3] >> (~offset & 0x7)) & 0x1) << (SPX_FORS_HEIGHT-1-j); |
|
Indeed, whoops. Generating new test vectors now ... |
|
Done. |
|
Is there a timeline for this getting merged? It's a breaking change so perhaps should come with some forewarning? |
SPHINCS+ (or SLH-DSA as it will be called by NIST) is not finalised, and could very well see even more changes. If you want to adopt early, you should fix on a specific commit (and keep track for bug fixes.) I'm sorry, this is annoying for early adopters, but that's the risk of adopting early. |
|
It's all good, was simply wondering about how the rollout would happen. Codewise the change is trivial, it is more the versioning and nomenclature around this change. |
c8116bc to
eccdc43
Compare
|
Rebased on master. |
As proposed by NIST's David Cooper: https://groups.google.com/a/list.nist.gov/g/pqc-forum/c/88tuvtb7nN4/m/DA1QCoJWBAAJ
eccdc43 to
129b72c
Compare
As proposed by NIST's David Cooper:
https://groups.google.com/a/list.nist.gov/g/pqc-forum/c/88tuvtb7nN4/m/DA1QCoJWBAAJ