Add unit test for InputStream layout processing#8
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a new unit test to validate the behavior of Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR adds a regression unit test to ensure DoclingPdfConversionRunner loads PDFs from an InputStream via LoadDocumentFromBytes, protecting the stream-based execution path introduced in PR #7.
Changes:
- Add a new semantics test covering
PdfConversionRequest.InputStreamusage and verifyingLoadDocumentFromBytesis called with the expected bytes. - Extend the
FakeParseSessiontest double to recordLoadDocumentFromBytesinvocations and the last provided byte payload.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 8a2c63dd67
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| var result = await runner.ExecuteAsync(new PdfConversionRequest | ||
| { | ||
| InputStream = memoryStream, | ||
| RunId = "run-stream", | ||
| Timeout = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(2) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Exercise the layout stage in this InputStream regression test
For stream-backed requests with layout inference enabled, this test will not catch the regression it claims to cover because the request never sets EnableLayoutInference. DoclingPdfConversionRunner.ExecuteAsync only builds the LayoutProcessRequest in the apply_layout_inference stage (dotnet/src/DoclingDotNet/Pipeline/DoclingPdfConversionRunner.cs:660-679), so a future break where layout providers stop receiving PdfBytes for InputStream inputs would still pass this test unchanged.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new unit test to verify the correct processing of InputStream by DoclingPdfConversionRunner. The test ensures that when an InputStream is provided, the LoadDocumentFromBytes method is called and the byte content is correctly passed to the parsing session. The FakeParseSession was updated to track these calls and the last loaded bytes, enabling proper assertion in the test. This is a valuable addition to prevent regressions related to InputStream handling.
|
|
||
| Assert.Equal(PipelineRunStatus.Succeeded, result.Pipeline.Status); | ||
| Assert.Equal(1, fake.LoadDocumentFromBytesCalls); | ||
| Assert.Equal(expectedBytes, fake.LastLoadedBytes); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This PR adds a test verifying that DoclingPdfConversionRunner properly uses LoadDocumentFromBytes when an InputStream is provided, preventing regressions on the logic introduced in PR #7.