Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "upcxx %oneapi@2025: cxxflags add -Wno-error=missing-template-… #47512

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 9, 2024

Conversation

eugeneswalker
Copy link
Contributor

See comment #47503 (comment)

Copy link
Contributor

@bonachea bonachea left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @eugeneswalker . I agree this revert should alleviate my concerns with potential regressions introduced by #47503 . As such I have no objections to merging this as-is to restore the status quo.

However I assume that doesn't resolve the OneAPI 2025 problem that motivated the original change.

Do you plan a separate follow-on PR to address that problem, or do you want to update this change to more surgically address the problem? I suspect the original change would have probably been fine if it instead did return (None, flags, None), but I've not tested that at all.

@eugeneswalker
Copy link
Contributor Author

Do you plan a separate follow-on PR to address that problem, or do you want to update this change to more surgically address the problem? I suspect the original change would have probably been fine if it instead did return (None, flags, None), but I've not tested that at all.

What I had in mind was: let us restore the status quo by reverting the PR that was merged prematurely. Then, after the reversion goes through, I will follow up with a PR that will (1) correctly preserve the existing flag_handler behavior while (2) adding the flag to resolve the issue with %oneapi@2025 and (3) allowing proper time for review.

Copy link
Contributor

@bonachea bonachea left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

let us restore the status quo by reverting the PR that was merged prematurely. Then, after the reversion goes through, I will follow up with a PR that will (1) correctly preserve the existing flag_handler behavior while (2) adding the flag to resolve the issue with %oneapi@2025 and (3) allowing proper time for review.

Sounds good to me.

@tgamblin tgamblin merged commit e99bf48 into spack:develop Nov 9, 2024
15 checks passed
fryeguy52 pushed a commit to fryeguy52/spack that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants