-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cmake: Add 3.28: #43723
Cmake: Add 3.28: #43723
Conversation
cc @alalazo |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI. Confirmed the 5 new version sha256s.
@johnwparent can you describe a little bit more the conflict with Kokkos? We have observed an issue using CMake 3.28.4 and Cuda (kokkos/kokkos#6898), but it should be solved in the last version 4.3.00 of Kokkos. Thank you very much in advance. |
Thanks as always!! |
With CMake 3.28 (all patch versions so far) we're seeing a CI failure specifically with
when tools eventually can't resolve the path to that target.
So it seems like when we updated the CUDA detection behavior in CMake, the Kokkos logic around these targets broke and is now producing bad KokkosConfig.cmake files @cedricchevalier19 is the Fix in Kokkos in a release that's part of Spack? If so I'll scope the conflict appropriately. |
Fix is present in For other versions, |
@cedricchevalier19 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is fine on the Kokkos side. I'll let @alalazo and the spack team decide if they want to separate the Kokkos conflicts
modification.
Note: requires #43780 |
e812408
to
1f7f9a0
Compare
dc1ed2a
to
1465a8f
Compare
PR'ing to asses status w.r.t. Kokos-kernel If this PR fails CI, we should look into patching kokos-kermel or limiting its CMake to pre 3.28 releases.
1465a8f
to
3bae4e8
Compare
No description provided.