Skip to content

Add note about version to PCW docs #1024

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add note about version to PCW docs #1024

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dadlerj
Copy link
Member

@dadlerj dadlerj commented Mar 11, 2025

This same version number applies to both VSC and JB right?

Pull Request approval

You will need to get your PR approved by at least one member of the Sourcegraph team. For reviews of docs formatting, styles, and component usage, please tag the docs team via the #docs Slack channel.

@dadlerj dadlerj requested a review from kelsey-brown March 11, 2025 00:19
Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 11, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
sourcegraph-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 11, 2025 0:22am

@kelsey-brown
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah this is a good question - technically the final fixes for this logging that went out with that VSCode version happened in the agent, and were just inherited by JetBrains (thread where I confirmed this previously). So there wasn't really a JB version associated officially...this was back before the releases were tied to one another directly

Looking at the timing the next JetBrains release that went out after VSCode 1.42 was 7.1.0 so we could add that filter here - but let me just double check with someone that that's how the version releases would work for changes made it the agent

@kelsey-brown
Copy link
Contributor

kelsey-brown commented Mar 14, 2025

@dadlerj confirmed it's 7.1.0. FWIW, we have very few users running these versions so the filtering doesn't really make much of a difference to the PCW calc in aggregate across 30, 90, or 120 day timeframes (checked across 3 big customers). It's probably still worth updating for completeness though.

Because of the way version numbers differ between clients, we'll need to implement an OR filter so we can handle the version filters for each client individually. Here's an example in Looker: https://sourcegraph.looker.com/explore/sourcegraph/v2_events?qid=fwTxOsbqxUl8lwz7bo10Kz&origin_space=562&toggle=dat,fil,vis

Let me know if you want me to open a separate PR to actually apply the filter.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants